People v. Aquino

Decision Date08 April 1986
Citation500 N.Y.S.2d 677,119 A.D.2d 464
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francisco AQUINO, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

R.L. Stavis, New York City, for respondent.

R.N. Allman, Chappaqua, for defendant-appellant.

Before MURPHY, P.J., and SULLIVAN, ROSS, MILONAS and KASSAL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J., at suppression hearing, plea and sentence), rendered November 14, 1984, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty to two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02), and sentencing him to two concurrent five year terms of probation, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion to suppress granted, the conviction vacated and the indictment dismissed.

On April 16, 1984, at about 8:45 p.m., Detectives Rodelli and Gallagher were on patrol in an unmarked car, when they observed appellant, operating a late model Mercury Cougar, speeding and "weaving in and out of traffic" on the Edward L. Grant Highway in the vicinity of 172nd Street in the Bronx. After following him, they identified themselves as police officers and ordered him to pull over to the curb. He complied, exited his car, and left the driver's door ajar. Both officers exited their vehicle, Rodelli requesting that appellant, who appeared nervous, produce his operator's license and registration. Rodelli conceded that there was nothing unusual, other than the fact that the registration was not in appellant's name. He testified that he planned to check if the vehicle had been stolen but, before doing so, continued his "field investigation" and approached the open driver's door. While standing outside, he stuck his head into the car to peer inside, at which point he observed two .38 caliber bullets on the floor, under the steering column, midway between the pedals and the driver's seat. He then searched the passenger compartment and recovered an ammunition pouch near where the bullets had been found and, after removing the keys from the ignition, opened the trunk, searched it and found two revolvers.

Following a hearing, the motion to suppress was denied, the court concluding that the officers had a reasonable basis to stop the vehicle, having observed appellant speeding and weaving in and out of traffic. It held that, in conducting a routine investigation, Rodelli had observed the bullets "in plain view" and that this gave him sufficient cause to search the car, which disclosed the presence of an ammunition belt and two revolvers in the trunk. As a result, it held that there was probable cause for the search and the arrest.

We disagree and find on this record no basis to hold that the People satisfied the initial burden of going forward to demonstrate the legality of the police conduct in the first instance (see, People v. Berrios, 28 N.Y.2d 361, 367, 321 N.Y.S.2d 884, 270 N.E.2d 709; People v. Malinsky, 15 N.Y.2d 86, 91, n. 2, 262 N.Y.S.2d...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • United States v. Levy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • November 21, 2016
    ...568, 569 (1995) (when officer "leaned into" instead of "merely peer[ed]" into a car, it constituted a search); People v. Aquino , 119 A.D.2d 464, 500 N.Y.S.2d 677, 678–79 (1986) (when officer "bent over and stuck his head into the car, to look at the floor," he performed a search). Officer ......
  • People v. Ocasio
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 24, 1986
    ...The issue here is not whether the officer had a right to look inside the car, although such a right would be doubtful. (People v. Aquino, 119 A.D.2d 464, 500 N.Y.S.2d 677.) The question is whether he had a right to seize and examine the contents of the bag. There was no predicate for such a......
  • People v. Creary
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 5, 2022
    ... ... observable from the outside, which constitutes a search ... within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment ( People v ... Young, 207 A.D.2d 465, 466 [2d Dept 1994]; see ... People v Class, 67 N.Y.2d 431 [1986]; People v ... Aquino, 119 A.D.2d 464 [1st Dept 1986]). Simple-if this ... were all that had transpired. But it is not ...          Officers ... responded to Creary's home because the complainant ... reported that several hours earlier, he had threatened her ... with a gun. They ... ...
  • People v. Bryon, 2004 NY Slip Op 51023(U) (NY 7/14/2004), 513/2004.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 14, 2004
    ...encroachment upon that citizen's privacy interest." People v. Torres, 74 N.Y.2d 224, 229-30 (1989). See also People v. Acquino, 119 A.D.2d 464, 465 (1st Dept. 1986) ("An ordinary traffic infraction . . . standing alone will not justify a search of the vehicle."); Guzman, supra, at 530 ("In ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT