People v. Arroyo
Decision Date | 25 April 1991 |
Citation | 77 N.Y.2d 947,573 N.E.2d 569,570 N.Y.S.2d 481 |
Parties | , 573 N.E.2d 569 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Reynaldo ARROYO, also known as Reynardo Arroyo, Appellant. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 162 A.D.2d 337, 557 N.Y.S.2d 898, should be affirmed.
While defendant now urges that the trial court committed reversible error in precluding him from calling his mother as a witness to corroborate certain details of his account of the night of the robbery, his offer of proof was insufficient to alert the trial court to the relevance of the testimony. For that reason, the trial court's exclusion of the witness was not reversible error. Defendant's remaining arguments, to the extent preserved, are without merit.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Ochoa, 2004 NY Slip Op 51133(U) (NY 6/28/2004)
...the prosecution's witnesses. See People v. Burgos, 207 A.D.2d 656 (1st Dept. 1994), lv. denied, 84 N.Y.2d 906 (1994), citing, People v. Arroyo 77 N.Y.2d 947 (1991), and Gottlieb, ORDERED, that the motion by Defendants is denied. The foregoing constitutes the decision and opinion of the Court. ...
-
Berry v. Artus, 08-CV-0807(MAT)
...testify with respect to the statement in question does not constitute reversible error. Berry, 43 A.D.3d at 1366-67 (citing People v Arroyo, 77 N.Y.2d 947, 948 (1991)). The respondent urges the Court to find petitioner's claim of evidentiary error procedurally barred. While it appears the A......
-
People v. Modzelewski
...to demonstrate that the communication was not protected by the attorney-client privilege (see, e.g., People v. Arroyo, 77 N.Y.2d 947, 948, 570 N.Y.S.2d 481, 573 N.E.2d 569; cf., People v. Gilliam, supra; People v. Thomas, 140 A.D.2d 562, 564, 528 N.Y.S.2d 634; People v. Forbes, 87 A.D.2d 82......
-
People v. Chadwick
...v. Gilmore, 66 N.Y.2d 863, 498 N.Y.S.2d 752, 489 N.E.2d 721; People v. Arroyo, 162 A.D.2d 337, 557 N.Y.S.2d 898, aff'd 77 N.Y.2d 947, 570 N.Y.S.2d 481, 573 N.E.2d 569). Defendant was also permitted to question police witnesses about the non-performance of the tests in It was a proper exerci......