People v. Batash

Decision Date09 July 1990
Citation558 N.Y.S.2d 570,163 A.D.2d 399
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Thomas BATASH, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Philip L. Weinstein, New York City (Jonathan Heller and Harold Ferguson, of counsel), for appellant.

John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Alix F. Kucker-Horland, of counsel), for respondent.

Before THOMPSON, J.P., and RUBIN, ROSENBLATT and MILLER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), all rendered November 4, 1987, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree under Indictment No. 5735/86, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree under Indictment No. 6598/86, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Indictment No. 8030/86, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. The appeal from the judgment rendered under Indictment No. 8030/86 brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress evidence.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant contends that an anonymous tip, which gave the make, license plate number, and color of a car allegedly involved in a drug-related armed robbery, was insufficient to justify the action taken by the police. Where the information conveyed is so specific and congruous with that which is actually encountered, the police may reasonably infer its reliability so as to support a reasonable suspicion justifying intrusive police action and even a protective pat down (see, People v. Benjamin, 51 N.Y.2d 267, 434 N.Y.S.2d 144, 414 N.E.2d 645; People v. Gray, 154 A.D.2d 301, 546 N.Y.S.2d 844; People v. Olsen, 93 A.D.2d 824, 460 N.Y.S.2d 828). In this case the police officers noticed a vehicle that bore the exact license plate number and was of the same make as the information conveyed by the informant. As the police were identifying themselves and approaching the vehicle, one of its occupants stepped out and began to run down the block. One of the officers apprehended this occupant and the other two officers told the other two occupants of the car to place their hands on the dashboard. The defendant instead "grabbed" a paper bag containing a .38 caliber revolver beneath his seat. The police were justified in taking reasonable measures in response to "factors rapidly developing or observed at the scene" (People v. Benjamin, supra, 51 ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Santiago
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 Julio 1994
    ...N.E.2d 562; People v. Bora, 191 A.D.2d 384, 595 N.Y.S.2d 437, aff'd 83 N.Y.2d 531, 611 N.Y.S.2d 796, 634 N.E.2d 168; People v. Batash, 163 A.D.2d 399, 558 N.Y.S.2d 570; see also, People v. Martinez, 80 N.Y.2d 444, 591 N.Y.S.2d 823, 606 N.E.2d 951; People v. Leung, 68 N.Y.2d 734, 506 N.Y.S.2......
  • People v. Lewis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Junio 1993
    ...of the information [or] exigent circumstances" (see, Matter of David B., 172 A.D.2d 828, 829, 569 N.Y.S.2d 198; People v. Batash, 163 A.D.2d 399, 400, 558 N.Y.S.2d 570; People v. Bond, 116 A.D.2d 28, 29, 499 N.Y.S.2d 724). Since the radio transmission received by Officer Hannon contained no......
  • People v. Legette
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Noviembre 1997
    ...N.Y.S.2d 573, 373 N.E.2d 372, affg. 55 A.D.2d 627, 389 N.Y.S.2d 399; People v. Jones, 230 A.D.2d 752, 646 N.Y.S.2d 62; People v. Batash, 163 A.D.2d 399, 558 N.Y.S.2d 570; People v. Olsen, 93 A.D.2d 824, 460 N.Y.S.2d 828; see also, Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct. 2412, 110 L.Ed.2d ......
  • People v. Argyris
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 10 Octubre 2012
    ...N.E.2d 379;People v. Colucci, 268 A.D.2d 531, 701 N.Y.S.2d 446;People v. Jones, 230 A.D.2d 752, 753, 646 N.Y.S.2d 62;People v. Batash, 163 A.D.2d 399, 558 N.Y.S.2d 570;see also Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146–147, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 32 L.Ed.2d 612;but see People v. Herold, 282 A.D.2d 1, 4–......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT