People v. Beard

• Decision Date: 10 January 1962
• Docket Number: Cr. 7982
• Citation: 18 Cal.Rptr. 350,199 Cal.App.2d 67
• Parties: PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Alfred Leonza BEARD aka Alfred Leonaz Beard, Defendant and Appellant.
• Court: California Court of Appeals

Page 350

18 Cal.Rptr. 350

199 Cal.App.2d 67

PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.Alfred Leonza BEARD aka Alfred Leonaz Beard, Defendant and Appellant.

Cr. 7982.

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California.

Jan. 10, 1962.

Alfred Leonza Beard, in pro. per.

Stanley Mosk, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In a jury trial, Alfred Leonza Beard was convicted of possession of marijuana.He admitted an allegation of the information that he had suffered a previous conviction of a narcotic offense.Before the trial defendant was represented by the public defender, but with the consent of defendantthe public defender was relieved and defendant was substituted as his own counsel.He was sentenced to state prison, appealed from the judgment in propria persona; he applied for appointment of counsel on the appeal; we read the record, determined that the appeal was groundless as hereinafter appears, and denied the application.Defendant was notified, was given time to file a brief and has filed none.

There was evidence of the following facts.Officers Schmida and Woodward learned by radio message of a robbery on Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles and that two male Negroes, driving a Chevrolet car, FEF 318, were sought as perpetrators of the robbery.The officers found the car parked in front of a motel some distance from the point of the robbery.Seated in the car were two men who gave their names as Washington and Thornton.The clothing of Washington corresponded with a description of the clothing of one of the wanted men which the officers had received.Neither one of the men was behind the wheel and when questioned by Officer Schmida, Washington stated that his cousin had been driving...