People v. Beasley

Decision Date15 May 1984
Citation477 N.Y.S.2d 325,62 N.Y.2d 767
Parties, 465 N.E.2d 1261 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Ronald T. BEASLEY, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (98 A.D.2d 946, 471 N.Y.S.2d 383).

COOKE, C.J., and JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. Driscoll
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 11, 1998
    ...was inaudible, we have found this procedure to be error (see, People v. Beasley, 98 A.D.2d 946, 471 N.Y.S.2d 383, affd. 62 N.Y.2d 767, 477 N.Y.S.2d 325, 465 N.E.2d 1261). Here, while the jury was provided with a recording device, the record does not indicate that it played the tapes. More i......
  • People v. Rostick
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 26, 1997
    ... ... Although a small portion of the audio is difficult to comprehend, the majority of the tape is audible and we perceive no realistic danger that the jury would be inclined to speculate as to the meaning of the sounds (see, People v. Beasley, 98 A.D.2d 946, 471 N.Y.S.2d 383, affd. 62 ... N.Y.2d 767, 477 N.Y.S.2d 325, 465 N.E.2d 1261) ...         Nor are we persuaded that County Court committed prejudicial error in permitting the People to recall Donlon following the testimony of a State Police Scientific Laboratory forensic ... ...
  • People v. Maderic
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 28, 1988
    ...encourage speculation about its contents ( cf., People v. Beasley, 98 A.D.2d 946, 471 N.Y.S.2d 383, affd. on mem. below 62 N.Y.2d 767, 477 N.Y.S.2d 325, 465 N.E.2d 1261). Defendant also argues that the prosecution's questions of Christman and the police officer improperly bolstered its case......
  • People v. Haddad
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 10, 1987
    ...v. New York, 446 U.S. 942, 100 S.Ct. 2166, 64 L.Ed.2d 797; People v. Beasley, 98 A.D.2d 946, 471 N.Y.S.2d 383, affd. 62 N.Y.2d 767, 477 N.Y.S.2d 325, 465 N.E.2d 1261; People v. Bazelais, 98 A.D.2d 802, 470 N.Y.S.2d 25). Nor was it error to summarily deny the defendant's motion to set aside ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT