People v. Beblowski, 106248.
| Decision Date | 30 April 2015 |
| Docket Number | 106248. |
| Citation | 2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 03579,8 N.Y.S.3d 467,127 A.D.3d 1505 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy BEBLOWSKI, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
127 A.D.3d 1505
8 N.Y.S.3d 467
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 03579
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent
v.
Timothy BEBLOWSKI, Appellant.
106248.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
April 30, 2015.
Brian M. Callahan, Schenectady, for appellant.
Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, ROSE and DEVINE, JJ.
Opinion
PETERS, P.J.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Drago, J.), rendered February 25, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree (three counts).
In satisfaction of a 25–count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal from the conviction and sentence. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant within the range contemplated by the plea agreement, namely, an aggregate prison term of eight years to be followed by postrelease supervision of 3 ½ years. Defendant now appeals.
We affirm. Defendant's contention “that his plea should be vacated due to County Court's failure to inquire as to a potential intoxication defense is not preserved for our review, as the record does not reflect that defendant made an appropriate postallocution motion” (People v. Brown, 125 A.D.3d 1049, 1049, 2 N.Y.S.3d 699 [2015] ; see People v. Duggins, 114 A.D.3d 1001, 1001–1002, 979 N.Y.S.2d 877 [2014], lvs. denied 23 N.Y.3d 961, 962, 988 N.Y.S.2d 568, 569, 11 N.E.3d 718, 719 [2014] ). Defendant, in any case, gave no indication during the plea colloquy that he was impaired at the time that the burglaries occurred, admitted without hesitation that he had committed them, and “said nothing that would have warranted further inquiry by County Court” (People v. Duggins, 114 A.D.3d at 1002, 979 N.Y.S.2d 877 ; see People v. Brown, 125 A.D.3d at 1049–1050, 2 N.Y.S.3d 699 ). Finally,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Hopper
...into a dwelling with the intent to commit a crime therein (see People v. Buck, 136 A.D.3d at 1118, 25 N.Y.S.3d 402; People v. Beblowski, 127 A.D.3d 1505, 1505, 8 N.Y.S.3d 467 [2015], lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 926, 17 N.Y.S.3d 88, 38 N.E.3d 834 [2015] ; People v. Jones, 73 A.D.3d 1386, 1387, 900 ......
-
In re Destiny C.
...as to the older girl, the middle boy's reports of sexual abuse, which, as previously mentioned, were sufficiently corroborated, included 8 N.Y.S.3d 467the assertion that the mother observed the father engaging in oral sexual conduct with the older girl. Therefore, the record supports the fi......
-
People v. Lewis
...absence of an appropriate postallocution motion (see People v. Tamah, 133 A.D.3d 923, 924, 20 N.Y.S.3d 436 [2015] ; People v. Beblowski, 127 A.D.3d 1505, 1505, 8 N.Y.S.3d 467 [2015], lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 926, 17 N.Y.S.3d 88, 38 N.E.3d 834 [2015] ). Further, our review of the record confirms......
-
People v. McKnight
...that she was impaired at the time of the robbery so as to require an inquiry regarding an intoxication defense (see People v. Beblowski, 127 A.D.3d 1505, 1505, 8 N.Y.S.3d 467 [2015], lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 926, 17 N.Y.S.3d 88, 38 N.E.3d 834 [2015] ; compare People v. Osgood, 254 A.D.2d 571, 5......