People v. Benjamin
| Decision Date | 25 April 2005 |
| Docket Number | 2004-01621. |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT BENJAMIN, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his statements to law enforcement officials were rendered involuntary as a result of his intoxication is without merit. Intoxication alone is insufficient to render a statement involuntary (see People v Roth, 139 AD2d 605, 606 [1988]). Only where it is demonstrated that the defendant was intoxicated to a degree of mania or of being unable to understand the meaning of his statements is suppression warranted (see People v Schompert, 19 NY2d 300, 305 [1967], cert denied 389 US 874 [1967]; People v Shields, 295 AD2d 374 [2002]; People v Perry, 144 AD2d 706 [1988]; People v Roth, supra). In this case, the evidence failed to establish that the defendant was intoxicated to such a degree.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Santos, 86 NY2d 869 [1995]; People v Carranza, 306 AD2d 351 [2003], affd 3 NY3d 729). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Perez
...88 S.Ct. 164, 19 L.Ed.2d 157) (see also People v. Adams, 26 N.Y.2d 129, 137, 309 N.Y.S.2d 145, 257 N.E.2d 610 [1970];People v. Benjamin, 17 A.D.3d 688, 689, 793 N.Y.S.2d 547 [2nd Dept.2005],lv. denied5 N.Y.3d 803, 803 N.Y.S.2d 32, 836 N.E.2d 1155;People v. Shields, 295 A.D.2d 374, 374, 742 ......
-
People v. Sicilianonunez
...19 N.Y.2d 300, 305, 279 N.Y.S.2d 515, 226 N.E.2d 305 ; People v. Ginsberg, 36 A.D.3d 627, 628, 831 N.Y.S.2d 81 ; People v. Benjamin, 17 A.D.3d 688, 689, 793 N.Y.S.2d 547 ). Here, the evidence failed to establish that the defendant was intoxicated to such a degree. The defendant's further co......
-
People v. Martinez
...to a degree of mania or of being unable to understand the meaning of his statements is suppression warranted" ( People v. Benjamin, 17 A.D.3d 688, 689, 793 N.Y.S.2d 547 ). In this case, the defendant failed to establish that he was intoxicated to such a degree. Viewing the evidence in the l......
-
People v. Alke
...of his statements as a consequence of intoxication ( see People v. Thornton, 87 A.D.3d 663, 663, 928 N.Y.S.2d 358; People v. Benjamin, 17 A.D.3d 688, 689, 793 N.Y.S.2d 547; People v. Roth, 139 A.D.2d 605, 606, 527 N.Y.S.2d 97). Accordingly, the [90 A.D.3d 944] Supreme Court correctly denied......