People v. Berrier

Decision Date23 January 1996
Citation223 A.D.2d 456,637 N.Y.S.2d 69
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Evilio BERRIER, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

G. Mansfield, for respondent.

A. Burke, for defendant-appellant.

Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and WALLACH, RUBIN, KUPFERMAN and MAZZARELLI, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J.), rendered January 7, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 2 1/2 to 5 years, and 1 year, and an unconditional discharge, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court correctly charged that in order to convict defendant of possessing a gravity knife, the prosecution had to prove that defendant knew he had a knife in his possession, not that he knew it was specifically a gravity knife, and that the knife fit the legal description of a gravity knife under Penal Law § 265.00(5). Knowledge that the thing possessed answers the description of one of the prohibited instruments is not an element of third-degree criminal possession of a weapon (Penal Law § 265.02[1]; People v. Visarities, 220 App.Div. 657, 658, 222 N.Y.S. 401, citing People v. Persce, 204 N.Y. 397, 97 N.E. 877; see also, People v. Ansare, 96 A.D.2d 96, 97, 468 N.Y.S.2d 269).

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • People v. Daly
    • United States
    • New York Criminal Court
    • October 21, 2011
    ...he possessed a knife; not that he knew that the knife fit the statutory description of a gravity knife. See People v. Berrier, 223 A.D.2d 456, 457, 637 N.Y.S.2d 69 (1st Dept.) lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 876, 645 N.Y.S.2d 450, 668 N.E.2d 421 (1996). As the minutes of the proceeding show, the Court......
  • People v. Neal
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 14, 2010
    ...58 A.D.3d 242, 253 n. 5, 869 N.Y.S.2d 401 [2008], lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 823, 881 N.Y.S.2d 30, 908 N.E.2d 938 [2008]; People v. Berrier, 223 A.D.2d 456, 637 N.Y.S.2d 69 [1996], lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 876, 645 N.Y.S.2d 450, 668 N.E.2d 421 [1996] ...
  • People v. Octavio
    • United States
    • New York Criminal Court
    • July 5, 2011
    ...under Penal Law 265.00. They are not required to prove that the defendant knew he possessed a gravity knife. ( People v. Berrier, 223 A.D.2d 456, 637 N.Y.S.2d 69 [1st Dept. 1996], lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 876, 645 N.Y.S.2d 450, 668 N.E.2d 421 [1996] ). The People were found to have proven the o......
  • People v. Parrilla
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 19, 2013
    ...that the knife met the statutory definition of a gravity knife ( see Neal, 79 A.D.3d at 524, 913 N.Y.S.2d 192; People v. Berrier, 223 A.D.2d 456, 637 N.Y.S.2d 69 [1st Dept. 1996], lv. denied88 N.Y.2d 876, 645 N.Y.S.2d 450, 668 N.E.2d 421 [1996] ). After sufficient inquiry, the court properl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT