People v. Bethune

Decision Date31 January 2012
Citation91 A.D.3d 966,937 N.Y.S.2d 596,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 00801
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Andrew BETHUNE, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 00801
91 A.D.3d 966
937 N.Y.S.2d 596

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Andrew BETHUNE, appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Jan. 31, 2012.


Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Lois Cullen Valerio of counsel; Jeffrey Wiener on the brief), for respondent.

[91 A.D.3d 966] Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colangelo, J.), rendered April 12, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court improperly delegated its authority to the prosecutor, who conducted most of the plea proceeding, thereby rendering his plea involuntary. The [91 A.D.3d 967] defendant's contention is without merit, as the proceeding was conducted in the County Court's presence

[937 N.Y.S.2d 597]

and under its supervision, and there is nothing in the record to suggest that the defendant's plea was made involuntarily ( see People v. Garbarini, 64 A.D.3d 1179, 1179–1180, 882 N.Y.S.2d 785; People v. Smith, 306 A.D.2d 210, 760 N.Y.S.2d 847; People v. Montanez, 287 A.D.2d 407, 408, 731 N.Y.S.2d 721; People v. Sanchez, 284 A.D.2d 137, 725 N.Y.S.2d 548; People v. Anthony, 188 A.D.2d 477, 591 N.Y.S.2d 181; People v. Empey, 141 A.D.2d 987, 988, 531 N.Y.S.2d 37).

MASTRO, A.P.J., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • People v. Batista
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 7, 2018
    ...by the prosecution, and if nothing else, the pointing out of any issues of concern, should be salutary in effect (see People v. Bethune, 91 A.D.3d 966, 937 N.Y.S.2d 596 ).It may be questioned whether appeal limitations play a significant role in bringing finality to criminal proceedings. To......
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 29, 2016
    ...in the record to suggest that the defendant's plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v. Bethune, 91 A.D.3d 966, 967, 937 N.Y.S.2d 596 ; People v. Smith, 306 A.D.2d 210, 211, 760 N.Y.S.2d 847 ; People v. Montanez, 287 A.D.2d 407, 408, 731 N.Y.S.2d 721 ; People......
  • People v. Baugh
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 31, 2012
  • People v. Simmons
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 25, 2015
    ...at the plea proceeding that the defendant's plea of guilty was negotiated with terms that included restitution (see People v. Bethune,91 A.D.3d 966, 967, 937 N.Y.S.2d 596; cf. People v. Gibson,88 A.D.3d 1012, 931 N.Y.S.2d 530). In any event, at sentencing, the defendant consented to the res......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT