People v. Blunt

Decision Date07 October 1991
Citation574 N.Y.S.2d 812,176 A.D.2d 741
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Robert BLUNT, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Matthew Muraskin, Hempstead (Kent V. Moston, of counsel), for appellant.

Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (Bruce E. Whitney and John F. McGlynn, of counsel), for respondent.

Before KUNZEMAN, J.P., and KOOPER, SULLIVAN and O'BRIEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered November 9, 1987, convicting him of assault in the first degree and burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By opinion and order of this court dated October 22, 1990, the case was remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to hear and report concerning the prosecutor's exercise of peremptory challenges, and the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim (see, People v. Blunt, 162 A.D.2d 86, 561 N.Y.S.2d 90). The County Court has now complied.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. The facts have been considered and are determined to have been established.

At the Batson hearing (Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69), the prosecutor was unable to recall his specific reasons for peremptorily striking all but two of 11 female prospective jurors. He provided a statement as to his general practice regarding jury selection, which he was unable to relate to this particular case, and simply denied any discriminatory intent in the exercise of peremptory challenges. At the trial, he had admitted that he was seeking to secure a gender-balanced jury in the face of a venire which he believed to be predominantly female.

Inasmuch as the prosecutor's testimony "amounted to little more than a denial of discriminatory purpose and a general assertion of good faith" (People v. Bozella, 161 A.D.2d 775, 776, 556 N.Y.S.2d 121), the People failed to satisfy their burden of overcoming the presumption of discrimination found by this court (see, People v. Dove, 172 A.D.2d 768, 569 N.Y.S.2d 147; People v. Sandy, 164 A.D.2d 898, 559 N.Y.S.2d 576; People v. Bozella, supra ).

The defendant's claim regarding the sufficiency of the evidence in support of his conviction of assault in the first degree is unavailing. By failing to assert the claims in support of his argument for dismissal of this count of the indictment with specificity before the trial court, the defendant...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Reyes v. Greiner
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • September 15, 2004
    ... ... The Appellate Division modified consecutive aspects of petitioner's sentence, but otherwise affirmed the judgment of conviction. People v. Reyes, 239 A.D.2d 524, 658 N.Y.S.2d 353 (2d Dep't 1997). Judge Bellacosa of the New York Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal. People v ... Duncan, 177 A.D.2d 187, 582 N.Y.S.2d 847 (4th Dep't 1992) (new trial); People v. Blunt, 176 A.D.2d 741, 574 N.Y.S.2d 812 (2d Dep't 1991) (new trial); People v. Irizarry, 165 A.D.2d 715, 560 N.Y.S.2d 279 (1st Dep't 1990) (new trial); ... ...
  • People v. Charles
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • November 30, 1992
    ... ... The gun was fired at "fairly close range," somewhere between a few inches and ten feet. There was also an abrasion near decedent's left eyelid and a bruise on the lower lip with a cut on the inside of the lip. These injuries were consistent with blunt trauma which might have occurred during a fight, or from falling ...         Officer Robert Smuda testified for the State that he was an evidence technician and that on May 29, 1986, he photographed the murder scene at the Rodgers home. Later, he was at the appliance store where he ... ...
  • People v. Mitchell
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 12, 1992
    ... ... Santini (1991), 232 Cal.App.3d 721, 283 Cal.Rptr. 751 (Di Donato ) (Batson applies to gender discrimination); State v. Gonzales (Ct.App.1991), 111 N.M. 590, 808 P.2d 40 (Gonzales ) (Batson applies to gender discrimination); People v. Blunt (1990), 162 A.D.2d 86, 561 N.Y.S.2d 90 (Blunt ) (Batson applies to gender discrimination); State v. Levinson (1990), 71 Haw. 492, 795 P.2d 845 (Levinson ) (gender-bias falls within ambit of state constitution and Batson ). Contra: United States v. Hamilton (4th Cir.1988), 850 F.2d 1038, 1042-43 ... ...
  • People v. Hiraeta
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 21, 2014
    ...764;People v. Pickersgill, 41 A.D.3d 866, 867, 837 N.Y.S.2d 585;People v. Crawford, 200 A.D.2d 683, 684, 607 N.Y.S.2d 48;People v. Blunt, 176 A.D.2d 741, 742, 574 N.Y.S.2d 812). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence ( seeCP......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT