People v. Bock Leung Chew, Cr. 3178

• Court: California Court of Appeals
• Citation: 298 P.2d 118,142 Cal.App.2d 400
• Decision Date: 19 June 1956
• Docket Number: Cr. 3178
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of California. Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOCK LEUNG CHEW, Defendant and Respondent.

Page 118

298 P.2d 118 142 Cal.App.2d 400 The PEOPLE of the State of California. Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
BOCK LEUNG CHEW, Defendant and Respondent. Cr. 3178. District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California. June 19, 1956.
Rehearing Denied July 3, 1956.
Hearing Denied July 18, 1956.

[142 Cal.App.2d 401] Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., Clarence A. Linn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Victor Griffith, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Benjamin M. Davis, San Francisco, for respondent.

DOOLING, Justice.

Defendant was charged with possessing a preparation of yen shee in violation of Health and Safety Code, § 11500. His motion to set the information aside, Pen.Code, § 995, was granted on the ground that all of

Page 119

the evidence against him was obtained by an illegal search and seizure in violation of his constitutional rights. The People appeal.

At the preliminary hearing Police Officer McKinley testified that on the evening of April 5, 1955, at about 9:15 p. m. he and another police officer happened to be in an apartment building located at 823 Grant Avenue. They had never been in the building before and there was nothing suspicious about the place. On their way to another apartment in this building they walked by the door of Apartment 5. One of the officers testified, 'We walked by the door and smelled--and it smelled of opium.'

The officers were admitted to the apartment by respondent's wife who was the only person present therein at the time. Respondent's wife did not speak English and did not understand the officers when they talked to her.

Upon entering a room of the apartment the officers became aware of a very strong smell of opium. They searched the premisses and under the kitchen cupboard found what later was identified as yen shee in a coffee can. A chemist for the Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement testified that yen shee is [142 Cal.App.2d 402] the residue from smoking opium. Between 9:15 and 11:00 p. m. they saw no one enter or leave the premises and during that perior of time they searched the apartment. At 11 p. m. the officers called an interpreter so that they could talk with respondent's wife.

The officers had neither a search warrant nor a warrant for anyone's arrest in Apartment 5.

Respondent's name and identification was obtained from telephone bills found in his apartment. He was arrested the following day about 4:30 p. m. at the Palace Hotel where he worked in the pantry. At that time respondent told the arresting officers that he found the yen shee outside his window when he moved into the apartment. He took it into his apartment...