People v. Boyea

Decision Date18 October 2007
Docket Number100830.
Citation844 N.Y.S.2d 156,2007 NY Slip Op 07775,44 A.D.3d 1093
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. SCOTT L. BOYEA, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Essex County (Meyer, J.), entered October 25, 2006, which, among other things, granted defendant's motion to suppress evidence.

KANE, J.

The United States Border Patrol set up a checkpoint along Interstate 87 in Essex County. An unidentified motorist approached a Border Patrol agent and informed him that a white GMC pickup truck with an extended cab and white tonneau cover executed a U-turn into the median just before the checkpoint. The agent relayed this information to Border Patrol Agent Cory White, who exited I-87 in an effort to encounter the truck on Route 9, a road parallel to the interstate. White saw a truck matching the description he had received and noticed the truck cross the center line, then overcorrect by driving right of the white fog line. After White activated his lights, the vehicle pulled over. As he approached the vehicle, defendant rolled down the window, at which time White smelled the odor of marihuana. Defendant, who was driving the truck and appeared fidgety, admitted that he had made a U-turn on I-87 to avoid the checkpoint. In response to a question about whether defendant had any marihuana, defendant acknowledged that he had smoked a little bit, but denied that there was any in the truck bed. When White stated that a canine handler could be called from the checkpoint, defendant stated, "Sir, you're going to bust me ... This is going to be hard on my mom because there's pounds back there." Defendant then consented to a search of the truck, which revealed 88 pounds of marihuana in two hockey bags under the tonneau cover.

Defendant was arrested and indicted for criminal possession of marihuana in the first degree. Following a hearing, County Court granted defendant's motion to suppress the physical evidence and his statement to White, requiring dismissal of the indictment. The People appeal.

County Court erroneously determined that Border Patrol agents do not have the authority to conduct searches or arrests for violations of state law. Designated federal law enforcement officers, including Customs and Border Patrol agents, are granted the powers accorded to peace officers in New York (see CPL 2.15 [7]; 2.20). Those powers include the authority to enforce state law by making warrantless arrests for offenses committed in the agent's presence and carrying out warrantless searches when constitutionally permissible and effected pursuant to the agent's duties (see CPL 2.20 [1] [a], [c]; see also Hodder v United States, 328 F Supp 2d 335, 343-344 [2004]). Hence, White's status as a federal agent did not deprive him of authority to stop or search defendant's truck, if those actions could have been permissibly executed by a state law enforcement agent.

White's stop and search of defendant's vehicle were justified under the circumstances. After receiving a description of a truck that avoided a checkpoint, White located a vehicle matching that description and observed the vehicle swerving on the road. Based on his belief that the vehicle may have evaded the checkpoint because it was smuggling aliens or narcotics, White reasonably...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Nelson, 106724
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 2017
    ...request for consent to search the vehicle (see People v. Blanco , 67 A.D.3d 923, 924, 889 N.Y.S.2d 93 [2009] ; People v. Boyea , 44 A.D.3d 1093, 1094–1095, 844 N.Y.S.2d 156 [2007] ; People v. Williams , 300 A.D.2d 684, 684–685, 752 N.Y.S.2d 709 [2002] ; People v. Carter , 199 A.D.2d 817, 81......
  • People v. McLean
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 25, 2012
    ...valid if they could properly have been performed by state law enforcement agents ( seeCPL 2.15[7]; 2.20, 140.25; People v. Boyea, 44 A.D.3d 1093, 1094, 844 N.Y.S.2d 156 [2007] ). An officer who has probable cause to believe that a driver has committed a traffic violation may lawfully stop t......
  • People v. Young
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 21, 2011
    ...2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 [1973]; People v. Gonzalez, 39 N.Y.2d 122, 124, 383 N.Y.S.2d 215, 347 N.E.2d 575 [1976]; People v. Boyea, 44 A.D.3d 1093, 1094–1095, 844 N.Y.S.2d 156 [2007] ), who had the requisite degree of authority and control over the vehicle to provide such consent ( see People v.......
  • People v. Dolan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 25, 2018
    ...719 [2017], lvs denied 31 N.Y.3d 1145, 1151, 1152, 83 N.Y.S.3d 427, 433, 434, 108 N.E.3d 501, 507, 508 [2018] ; People v. Boyea, 44 A.D.3d 1093, 1094–1095, 844 N.Y.S.2d 156 [2007] ; see generally People v. Hodge, 44 N.Y.2d 553, 559, 406 N.Y.S.2d 736, 378 N.E.2d 99 [1978] ). Accordingly, def......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT