People v. Bradley
Decision Date | 28 February 1967 |
Docket Number | Cr. 5739 |
Citation | 248 Cal.App.2d 887,57 Cal.Rptr. 82 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Thomas Norman BRADLEY, Defendant and Appellant. |
Thomas Norman Bradley, in pro. per.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of State of California, Edward P. O'Brien, John P. Oakes, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, for respondent.
Defendant, Thomas N. Bradley, in pro. per., appeals from an order dated April 8, 1966, denying his application to expunge the record of his prior conviction pursuant to section 1203.4 of the Penal Code. He contends that the trial court erred in denying him the mandatory relief provided by the statute.
The facts are not in dispute. On December 7, 1964, defendant was convicted on his plea of guilty to attempted burglary, a felony, in violation of section 459 of the Penal Code. 1 The court suspended imposition of the sentence, placed defendant under the supervision of the probation officer and as a condition of probation ordered defendant to spend six months of the probationary period in the county jail. On April 16, 1965, on petition of the probation officer, the term was reduced to the time already served, probation was terminated and defendant released. On October 19, 1965, defendant was charged by information with robbery (Pen.Code, § 211), kidnapping (Pen.Code, § 207) and three prior convictions, the third being the 1964 attempted burglary. On December 7, 1965, defendant pled guilty to the charge of auto theft, an offense included within the offense charged in the first count of the information, and admitted the third prior, the attempted burglary. Thereafter, on the motion of the district attorney, the kidnapping count of the information and the first and second prior convictions were dismissed. Defendant's motion for probation was denied and he was sentenced to the state prison for the term prescribed by law. 2 On March 30, 1966, defendant filed his application seeking withdrawal of his plea of guilty to the attempted burglary charge and dismissal of the accusation pursuant to section 1203.4 of the Penal Code.
Section 1203.4 of the Penal Code provides:
Defendant relies on People v. Johnson, 134 Cal.App.2d 140, 285 P.2d 74. In that case, the defendant was convicted of felony drunk driving, given probation and sometime after the expiration of the probationary period, applied for dismissal. The trial court denied the application on the ground that seven months after expiration of the probationary period, the defendant again violated the same Vehicle Code section. In reversing, the appellate court said at pages 143 and 144, 285 P.2d at page 76:
The court went on to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Tankersley
...upon the person or prevent his or her conviction under Section 12021.10 Cal.Penal Code § 1203.4(a). See e.g., People v. Bradley, 248 Cal.App.2d 887, 890, 57 Cal.Rptr. 82, 84 (1967) (where sentence was not imposed and probation successfully completed, defendant entitled to dismissal of prior......
-
United States v. Tankersley, 4:03CR3000 (D. Neb. 5/19/2003), 4:03CR3000.
...the person or prevent his or her conviction under Section 12021.10 Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4(a). See e.g., People v. Bradley, 248 Cal.App.2d 887, 890, 57 Cal.Rptr. 82, 84 (1967) (where sentence was not imposed and probation successfully completed, defendant entitled to dismissal of prior fel......
-
People v. Nasalga, A063101
...awareness of, and acquiescence to, intermediate appellate holdings far more obscure than the rule in Estrada. (People v. Bradley (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 887, 890, 57 Cal.Rptr. 82.) The fact that Estrada does not pertain to a narrow area of substantive or procedural law hardly provides a reaso......
-
Griffin, In re
...meets the requirements of section 1203.4 the court not only can but must proceed in accord with that statute. (People v. Bradley (1967) 248 A.C.A. 1035, 1037, 57 Cal.Rptr. 82; People v. Johnson (1955) 134 Cal.App.2d 140, 144, 285 P.2d 74; see Ex parte Slattery (1912) supra, 163 Cal. 176, 12......