People v. Bray
Decision Date | 25 May 1964 |
Citation | 251 N.Y.S.2d 930,21 A.D.2d 696 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chauncey BRAY, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
David F. Jordan, Central Islip, for appellant.
Bernard C. Smith, Dist. Atty., Riverhead, for respondent; Charles T. Matthews, Huntington, of counsel.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 26, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of selling narcotics (Penal Law, § 1751, subd. 1), and of possessing narcotics (Penal Law, § 1751-a); and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed (see People v. Wright, 20 A.D.2d 652, 246 N.Y.S.2d 250).
In our opinion, the proof established that defendant was acting merely as an agent for the purchaser; hence, he cannot be convicted of selling narcotics (People v. Lindsey and Norris, 16 A.D.2d 805, 228 N.Y.S.2d 427, affd. 12 N.Y.2d 958, 238 N.Y.S.2d 956, 189 N.E.2d 492; People v. Branch, 13 A.D.2d 714, 213 N.Y.S.2d 535; People v. Buster, 286 App.Div. 1141, 145 N.Y.S.2d 437; United States v. Moses, 3 Cir., 220 F.2d 166; United States v. Sawyer, 3 Cir., 210 F.2d 169). The proof did establish, however, the defendant's guilt of the misdemeanor of unlawful possession of narcotics.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Bray
...BRAY, Appellant. Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 3, 1964. Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 21 A.D.2d 696, 251 N.Y.S.2d 930. Defendant was convicted of selling narcotics in violation of the Penal Law, Consol.Laws, c. 40, § 1751, subd. 1, and of possessing ......