People v. Bronson
| Decision Date | 26 October 1972 |
| Citation | 39 A.D.2d 464,337 N.Y.S.2d 215 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William F. BRONSON, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
William F. Bronson, appellant in person, and Warren E. George, Jr., Cornell Legal Assistance Project, Ithaca, for appellant (Thomas V. Harris, Ithaca, of counsel).
Richard D. Enders, Dist. Atty., Utica, for respondent (Rocco Louis Versace, Utica, of counsel).
Before DEL VECCHIO, J.P., and MARSH, WITMER, MOULE and CARDAMONE, JJ.
DEL VECCHIO, Justice Presiding:
On July 29, 1969 defendant threatened to kill his alleged wife, said that he was going to kill her that night, and with intent to kill he attempted to run over her body with his truck. He was arrested and arraigned on a charge of attempted murder. After a preliminary hearing he was held for action by a grand jury. Thereafter a one count indictment was returned accusing defendant of attempted murder in violation of sections 110.00 and 125.25(1) of the Penal Law in that on July 29, 1969 with intent to cause the death of Roxanne Bronson he attempted to cause her death. The court charged the lesser included degrees of assault. When defense counsel took exception to this portion of the charge the court said, 'Do you want me to charge on only guilty or not guilty on attempted murder?' and counsel replied, 'No, sir.' The jury found defendant guilty of assault in the first degree, even though the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction for attempted murder.
On this appeal defendant contends that County Court lacked jurisdiction to try him because section 812 of the Family Court Act gives Family Court execlusive original jurisdiction over any proceeding concerning acts which would constitute an assault between spouses. He argues that, since the matter was never transferred to Family Court as required by section 813 and there was never an initial determination by Family Court that the matter could not there be resolved, the grand jury was powerless to indict, citing People v. Johnson, 20 N.Y.2d 220, 282 N.Y.S.2d 481, 229 N.E.2d 180. That case is readily distinguishable in that there the defendant was arrested and charged with assaulting his wife, a charge over which Family Court had original jurisdiction. In the instant case defendant was never charged with committing an assault and was not being prosecuted for assault, which must begin in Family Court; he was arrested, charged, and indicted for attempted murder, a charge over which Family Court does not have jurisdiction (see People v. Nuernberger, 25 N.Y.2d 179, 303 N.Y.S.2d 74, 250 N.E.2d 352). The fact that a basic element of the crimes of murder, attempted murder, and manslaughter is an assault does not bring these offenses within the purview of the Family Court Act, even though such offenses may be committed between spouses (Matter of Whiting v. Shepard, 35 A.D.2d 11, 312 N.Y.S.2d 414).
Furthermore, this is not, as urged...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Kenyon
...between parent and child or between members of the same family or household. The language of this section is mandatory (People v. Bronson, 39 A.D.2d 464, 337 N.Y.S.2d 215; People v. Battaglia, 39 A.D.2d 833, 333 N.Y.S.2d 47; People v. Berger, 40 A.D.2d 192, 338 N.Y.S.2d 762). The purpose of......
-
People v. Vaughn
...was charged with only the crime of manslaughter, the Family Court did not have exclusive jurisdiction over the action (People v. Bronson, 39 A.D.2d 464, 337 N.Y.S.2d 215). In the case of People v. Jones, 59 A.D.2d 617, 398 N.Y.S.2d 162, the defendant was charged with attempted murder, assau......
-
People ex rel. Balk v. Warden, Queens House of Detention for Men
...Family Court Act, dealing with certain intrafamily offenses. We agree. We deem the holding of the Fourth Department in People v. Bronson, 39 A.D.2d 464, 337 N.Y.S.2d 215 to be distinguishable in that Krcelic stands accused of both attempted murder and assault in the first degree, rather tha......