People v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co.
Decision Date | 08 January 1907 |
Parties | PEOPLE v. BROOKLYN COOPERAGE CO. et al. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Action by the people of the state of New York against the Brooklyn Cooperage Company and another. From a judgment affirmed by the Appellate Division (100 N. Y. Supp. 19,114 App. Div. 723) overruling its demurrer, defendant Brooklyn Cooperage Company appeals. Affirmed.
Edward M. Shepard, for appellant.
Julius M. Mayer, Atty. Gen. (Edward B. Whitney and John Agar, of counsel), for respondent.
This appeal is allowed by the Appellate Division, and the following question certified: ‘Does the complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action?’
The defendant, Cornell University, was created a corporation under Laws 1865, p. 1188, c. 585; section 4 (page 1189) reading in part as follows:
An act was passed in 1898 (page 230, c. 122) entitled ‘An act to promote education in forestry, to encourage and provide for the establishment of a college of forestry at Cornell University, and making an appropriation therefor.’ The act provides:
* * *
Section 5 provides in detail for payment by the state of the consideration for the lands so contracted to be purchased.
Sections 6 and 7, as amended in 1900 (pages 641, 642, c. 301), provide for the custody and expenditure of appropriations and proceeds from the sale of timber, the same being under state control.
Section 9 reads, in part, as follows: ‘Upon and at the expiration of thirty years from and after the taking effect of this act, all lands and each and every part and parcel thereof, purchased by said university, and paid for by the state under and pursuant to the provisions of this act, shall be by the board of trustees of said university, or its successors, granted and conveyed to the people of the state of New York by a good and sufficient deed of conveyance, without further price or consideration therefor, and the same shall thereupon be and become a part of the forest preserve.’
The complaint alleges that the Brooklyn Cooperage Companyand Cornell University are domestic corporations; that on or about December 21, 1898, by its deed bearing date on that day, the Santa Clara Lumber Company conveyed to the defendant Cornell University about 30,000 acres of land in the county of Franklin, state of New York, most of which was then covered with forests; a copy of said deed is annexed to the complaint and made a part of it; that the university shortly thereafter took possession of the lands so conveyed; that the deed was recorded in the office of the clerk of Franklin county and in the office of the Secretary of State. The deed reads, in part, as follows: ‘And this conveyance is taken by the party of the second part upon condition that the same and the title to the land herein and hereby conveyed is taken by said party of the second part under and pursuant to the provisions of chapter 122 of the Laws of 1898, entitled ‘An act to promote education in forestry, to encourage and provide for the establishment of a college of forestry at Cornell University, and making an appropriation therefor,’ and the party of the second part covenants that this conveyance and the title to the land herein and hereby conveyed is taken by said party of the second part under and pursuant to the provisions of said chapter 122, of the Laws of 1898.' Then follows a covenant that the land conveyed to the party of the second part is for the uses and purposes of the said act of 1898, and that the covenant shall run with the land. Following is a covenant that the university will convey to the state in 30 years from the taking effect of the said act of 1898 as therein provided.
It is further alleged that the university accepted the provisions of the act of 1898 (page 230, c. 122); that, after acceptance, and prior to the conveyance, the trustees of the university had created and established a department therein known as and called the ‘New York State College of Forestry,’ being the college referred to in the first section of chapter 122, p. 230, of the Laws of 1898, for the purposes of education and instruction in the principles and practice of scientific forestry; and thereafter and also prior to said conveyance the board of trustees of said university for the purposes of such school and for carrying out the objects of said act, and with the consent and approval and under the direction of the forest preserve board of this state had contracted for the purchase of the land aforesaid. The remainder of the complaint reads as follows: ‘(5) The sole consideration paid for the conveyance aforesaid (other than the considerations, if any, contained or implied in the conditions and covenants of the deed), was the sum of one hundred and sixty-five thousand dollars ($165,000.00), which entire sum was paid to the Santa Clara Lumber Company by the Treasurer of the state of New York from moneys in the state treasury.’ The remainder of this section is not material at this time. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Wander v. Kimmel
...1 Dillon, Mun. Corps. (5 Ed.), sec. 430; People ex rel. v. French, 46 Hun, 232; People ex rel. v. Andrews, 89 Hun, 452; People v. Cooperage Co., 187 N.Y. 142; State ex rel. v. St. Louis, 216 Mo. 47. (b) decision is generally criticized. Aetna Ins. Co. v. Jones, 78 S.C. 445; Association v. W......
-
Gorman-Bakos v. Cornell Coop. Schenectady Co.
...through legislative act or contract with the state or subdivision of the state performs governmental functions. See People v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co., 187 N.Y. 142, 156 (1907); see also Stahl Soap Corp v. City of New York, 182 N.Y.S.2d 808, 809 (N.Y. 1959) (New York City is a subordinate gov......
-
MacMullen v. City of Middletown
... ... City of Mt. Vernon, 87 Hun, 29, 33 N. Y. Supp. 745, in Patterson v. City of Brooklyn, 6 App. Div. 129,40 N. Y. Supp. 581, and in Thrall v. Cuba Village, 88 App. Div. 413,84 N. Y. Supp ... People ex rel. Wood v. Draper, 15 N. Y. 532, 544;People v. Tweed, 63 N. Y. 207;Meriwether v. Garrett, 102 ... ...
- Precht v. Howard