People v. Brooks

Decision Date17 November 2005
Docket Number15627.,15675.
Citation23 A.D.3d 847,2005 NY Slip Op 08781,804 N.Y.S.2d 140
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAREN A. BROOKS and CLAUDE A. CHARLES, Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Appeals from two judgments of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered December 19, 2003 and December 24, 2003, convicting defendants following a nonjury trial of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Peters, J.

On February 10, 2003, State Troopers Michael Schreiber and Donald Kucmierkowski received information from the Chemung County Drug Task Force that there was an outstanding warrant for the arrest of defendant Claude A. Charles. They were further advised that Charles would be traveling in a blue Ford Windstar with another individual along State Route 17 sometime after midnight and that Charles would be transporting narcotics from New York City.

At approximately 2:00 A.M. the following day, the troopers observed a blue Ford Windstar drive past them on State Route 17 with the rear license plate obscured by dirt and snow. Upon their initiation of a vehicle stop, the driver applied his brakes, yet the reverse lights of the vehicle also flashed on. Schreiber asked both individuals to identify themselves. Defendant Daren A. Brooks, the driver, correctly identified himself but Charles identified himself as "Ron Charles"; the troopers knew that he was not Ron Charles but rather Claude Charles. Having detected an odor of alcohol in the vehicle, Schreiber asked Brooks to step out of the car. Schreiber showed him the obscured license plate and determined that the odor of alcohol was not coming from him. Kucmierkowski asked Charles to exit the vehicle, once again offered him the opportunity to identify himself and explained the law regarding false personation; he maintained that his name was Ron Charles. He was then arrested for false personation. Determining that Charles smelled of alcohol and observing a six-pack container between the two front seats with only one beer bottle remaining, Schreiber searched the vehicle for open containers of alcohol. In the course of such search, he discovered a blue plastic bag under the passenger's seat containing a white powdered substance which later tested positive for cocaine.

Defendants were charged, through separate indictments, with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree. After a hearing, County Court determined that the stop was justified and that the search of the vehicle was valid. It reasoned that the troopers executed a vehicle and traffic stop based upon probable cause and that the unfolding of events, following the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • People v. Durham
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 12 Enero 2017
    ...96 A.D.3d 34, 40, 942 N.Y.S.2d 93 [2012], lv. denied 19 N.Y.3d 999, 951 N.Y.S.2d 475, 975 N.E.2d 921 [2012] ; People v. Brooks, 23 A.D.3d 847, 849, 804 N.Y.S.2d 140 [2005], lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 810, 812 N.Y.S.2d 449, 845 N.E.2d 1280 [2006] ). At the time that they initiated the stop, the off......
  • People v. Paige
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 28 Octubre 2010
  • People v. Newman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Abril 2012
    ...were legally entitled to stop defendants' vehicle because it was being operated with an obstructed license plate (see People v. Brooks, 23 A.D.3d 847, 804 N.Y.S.2d 140 [2005], lv. denied 942 N.Y.S.2d 98 6 N.Y.3d 810, 812 N.Y.S.2d 449, 845 N.E.2d 1280 [2006]; see also Vehicle and Traffic Law......
  • People v. Brock
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 6 Junio 2013
    ...[2012];People v. Hawkins, 45 A.D.3d at 991, 845 N.Y.S.2d 171;People v. Garcia, 30 A.D.3d at 834, 817 N.Y.S.2d 723;People v. Brooks, 23 A.D.3d 847, 849, 804 N.Y.S.2d 140 [2005],lv. denied6 N.Y.3d 810, 812 N.Y.S.2d 449, 845 N.E.2d 1280 [2006] ). 2. Defendant also contends that he received ine......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT