People v. Brown

Decision Date11 April 1974
Citation354 N.Y.S.2d 263,44 A.D.2d 769
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard BROWN, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Donald L. Austin, Frank E. Blando, Utica, for appellant.

Richard D. Enders, Raymond A. Tarkowski, Utica, for respondent.

Before WITMER, J.P., and MOULE, CARDAMONE, GOLDMAN and DEL VECCHIO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant, who was convicted after a jury trial of burglary in the third degree, claims that the court erred in denying his request for a pre-trial hearing upon an alleged oral confession which defendant denied he made. Upon trial defendant testified to alleged police brutality in an effort to induce him to confess. When a defendant demands a hearing pursuant to People v. Huntley, 15 N.Y.2d 72, 255 N.Y.S.2d 838, 204 N.E.2d 179, the burden is upon the People to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the alleged confession was made without coercion and was the defendant's voluntary act. Notwithstanding defendant's denial that he made any statement to the police, in view of his testimony as to brutality he 'was entitled to full inquiry into the voluntary nature of his purported confession even though he denied having made any confession' (People v. Wright, 21 N.Y.2d 1011, 1012, 290 N.Y.S.2d 930, 932, 238 N.E.2d 330, 332). Defendant makes no other claim of error and we therefore remit this matter solely for a hearing and determination of the question of his alleged confession.

Decision reserved, case held and matter remitted to Oneida County Court for proceedings in accordance with the preceding.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Johnson, 16
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 12 Enero 1982
    ...Phinney, 117 N.H. 145, 370 A.2d 1153 (1977); State v. Whittington, 142 N.J.Super. 45, 359 A.2d 881 (App.Div.1976); People v. Brown, 44 A.D.2d 769, 354 N.Y.S.2d 263 (1974); State v. Aschmeller, 87 S.D. 367, 209 N.W.2d 369 (1973); Valerio v. State, 494 S.W.2d 892 (Tex.Crim.App.1973); Blaszke ......
  • People v. Murchinson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Mayo 1978
    ...he had never been given his Miranda warnings (see People v. Wright, 21 N.Y.2d 1011, 290 N.Y.S.2d 930, 238 N.E.2d 330; People v. Brown, 44 A.D.2d 769, 354 N.Y.S.2d 263). During the summation, the prosecutor stated, with reference to the defendant, "I submit to you that the lie in this case, ......
  • People v. Armioia
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 7 Febrero 1983
    ...21 N.Y.2d 1011, 1012, 290 N.Y.S.2d 930, 238 N.E.2d 330; see People v. Murchinson, 63 A.D.2d 655, 404 N.Y.S.2d 648; People v. Brown, 44 A.D.2d 769, 354 N.Y.S.2d 263). Accordingly, a hearing is directed to determine whether the defendant's alleged confession was voluntarily obtained by the ...
  • People v. Grover
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 Diciembre 1979
    ...As the District Attorney acknowledges, the trial court improperly denied defendant's request for a Huntley hearing (People v. Brown, 44 A.D.2d 769, 354 N.Y.S.2d 263; see also, People v. Murchinson, 63 A.D.2d 655, 404 N.Y.S.2d 648). While defendant argues that he was incapable of validly wai......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT