People v. Brown

Decision Date19 April 1993
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Robert BROWN, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Philip L. Weinstein, New York City (Melissa Johnson and Winston McIntosh, of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (John M. Castellano and Ellen Matowik, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered April 9, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant claims that his rights were violated when the jury requested a readback of certain testimony, and the court either failed to respond or did so without notifying counsel. Since this claim rests on matters which are not contained in the record, its presentation on direct appeal is improper (see, People v. Noland, 189 A.D.2d 829, 592 N.Y.S.2d 465; People v. Weinberg, 183 A.D.2d 930, 586 N.Y.S.2d 131). We find that the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Delgado, 80 N.Y.2d 780, 587 N.Y.S.2d 271, 599 N.E.2d 675).

THOMPSON, J.P., and ROSENBLATT, LAWRENCE and SANTUCCI, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Lugo v. Kuhlmann
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • October 7, 1999
    ...823, 824 (2d Dep't), appeal denied, 83 N.Y.2d 871, 877, 613 N.Y.S.2d 132, 137, 635 N.E.2d 301 (1994); People v. Brown, 192 A.D.2d 666, 666, 598 N.Y.S.2d 717, 717 (2d Dep't) ("Since this claim rests on matters which are not contained in the record, its presentation on direct appeal is improp......
  • Franza v. Stinson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 1, 1999
    ...from the judgment of conviction."), appeal denied, 82 N.Y.2d 927, 610 N.Y.S.2d 180, 632 N.E.2d 490 (1994); People v. Brown, 192 A.D.2d 666, 666, 598 N.Y.S.2d 717, 717 (2d Dep't) ("The defendant claims that his rights were violated when the jury requested a readback of certain testimony, and......
  • People v. Dixon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 14, 1994
    ...in the record, its presentation on direct appeal is improper (see, People v. Harvall, 196 A.D.2d 533, 601 N.Y.S.2d 146; People v. Brown, 192 A.D.2d 666, 598 N.Y.S.2d 717; People v. Noland, 189 A.D.2d 829, 592 N.Y.S.2d RITTER, J.P., and PIZZUTO, FRIEDMANN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur. ...
  • People v. Harvey
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 21, 1995
    ...544-545, 496 N.Y.S.2d 65). The defendant's remaining claim is not reviewable on direct appeal from the judgment (see, People v. Brown, 192 A.D.2d 666, 598 N.Y.S.2d 717; People v. Noland, 189 A.D.2d 829, 592 N.Y.S.2d 465; People v. Weinberg, 183 A.D.2d 930, 586 N.Y.S.2d ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT