People v. Burgos
| Decision Date | 11 July 2012 |
| Citation | 97 A.D.3d 689,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 05540,947 N.Y.S.2d 897 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jose BURGOS, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Allegra Glashausser of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Jeanette Lifschitz, and Tina Grillo of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered May 6, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, possession of burglar's tools, petit larceny, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the challenges he now raises to portions of the prosecutor's summation ( seeCPL 470.05[2]; People v. Bey, 71 A.D.3d 1156, 1157, 898 N.Y.S.2d 189;People v. Philbert, 60 A.D.3d 698, 699, 874 N.Y.S.2d 540;People v. Gill, 54 A.D.3d 965, 864 N.Y.S.2d 135;People v. Gillespie, 36 A.D.3d 626, 831 N.Y.S.2d 83;People v. Siriani, 27 A.D.3d 670, 811 N.Y.S.2d 127). In any event, the challenged remarks were fair comment on the evidence, responsive to arguments and theories raised by the defense, or otherwise remained within the “broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument” ( People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 399, 446 N.Y.S.2d 9, 430 N.E.2d 885;see People v. Wilson, 77 A.D.3d 858, 908 N.Y.S.2d 885;People v. Bravo, 69 A.D.3d 870, 894 N.Y.S.2d 465;People v. Dorgan, 42 A.D.3d 505, 838 N.Y.S.2d 787;People v. Ravenell, 307 A.D.2d 977, 762 N.Y.S.2d 919;People v. Valdes, 291 A.D.2d 513, 738 N.Y.S.2d 223).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( seeCPL 470.15[2][c], [6][b]; 470.20[6]; People v. Thompson, 60 N.Y.2d 513, 519, 470 N.Y.S.2d 551, 458 N.E.2d 1228;People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Fuhrtz
...54 N.Y.2d 396, 399, 446 N.Y.S.2d 9, 430 N.E.2d 885 ; see People v. Thompson, 118 A.D.3d 822, 987 N.Y.S.2d 189 ; People v. Burgos, 97 A.D.3d 689, 947 N.Y.S.2d 897 ). Although the challenged remarks made during the opening statement and some of the challenged remarks made during summation wer......
-
People v. Braham
...97 A.D.3d 689948 N.Y.S.2d 1222012 N.Y. Slip Op. 05539The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Steve BRAHAM, appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.July 11, [948 N.Y.S.2d 123]Law Offices of Douglas G. Rankin, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.Charles J. Hynes, Distr......
-
People v. Burgos
...a wristwatch from that home, and resisting arrest. The judgment of conviction was affirmed on appeal ( People v. Burgos, 97 A.D.3d 689, 947 N.Y.S.2d 897 ). The defendant then moved to vacate the judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10 on the ground of ineffective assistance of trial c......
-
People v. Blake
...argument (see People v. Wiley, 119 A.D.3d 821, 989 N.Y.S.2d 324 ; People v. Jean, 118 A.D.3d 1024, 987 N.Y.S.2d 630 ; People v. Burgos, 97 A.D.3d 689, 947 N.Y.S.2d 897...