People v. Butler

Decision Date23 April 1959
Citation16 Misc.2d 1100,185 N.Y.S.2d 51
PartiesPEOPLE of State of New York, Plaintiffs, v. Francis H. BUTLER, Defendant.
CourtNew York County Court

Edward S. Silver, Dist. Atty. of Kings County, William I. Siegel, Asst. Dist. Atty., Brooklyn, for the people.

Francis H. Butler, pro se.

HYMAN BARSHAY, Judge.

This is an application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis to vacate and set aside a judgment, dated April 8, 1957, convicting the defendant, on his own plea of guilty, of the crime of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to the Elmira Reformatory. The defendant claims, (1) that he was unlawfully arrested because the arresting officer was without warrant; (2) that there was an unreasonable delay in his arraignment before a Magistrate; (3) that the Court had erroneously received and considered evidence which was used as a basis for the sentence imposed; (4) that at sentence, section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not complied with in that he was not asked if he had any legal cause to show why judgment should not be pronounced against him. None of the aforesaid are grounds for relief by way of coram nobis (People v. Sullivan, 3 N.Y.2d 196, 200, 165 N.Y.S.2d 6).

His conclusory charges that 'the plea of guilty was illegally entered, and was obtained as a result of fear and intimidation, produced by the use of fraud, coercion, threats and misrepresentations,' is wholly unsupported by proof. Therefore, no hearing need be held (People v. White, 309 N.Y. 636, 132 N.E.2d 880). The application is, therefore, in all respects denied. Let the District Attorney submit an order to that effect and serve a copy of it, when signed, on the defendant together with notice of entry thereof, by mail, at the institution where he is presently confined.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Brancazio
    • United States
    • New York Court of General Sessions
    • February 8, 1960
    ...face of the record. People v. Baldwin, 15 Misc.2d 431, 182 N.Y.S.2d 85, motion denied 7 A.D.2d 629, 181 N.Y.S.2d 761; People v. Butler, 16 Misc.2d 1100, 185 N.Y.S.2d 51; People v. Lesser, 280 App.Div. 441, 113 N.Y.S.2d 558, affirmed 304 N.Y. 903, 110 N.E.2d 734, application denied 305 N.Y. ......
  • People v. Smith
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 12, 1961
    ...of those issues need not be required.' See also Hedgecock v. Oneida County Court, 19 Misc.2d 459, 190 N.Y.S.2d 786; People v. Butler, 16 Misc.2d 1100, 185 N.Y.S.2d 51; People v. De Barros, 1 A.D.2d 845, 149 N.Y.S.2d Since defendant's claims are without merit, the application is in all respe......
  • Hedgecock v. Oneida County Court
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • September 16, 1959
    ...he was arraigned by Peace Justice J. Ertman Crouse. This is unavailable to petitioner in a coram nobis application. People v. Butler, 1959, 16 Misc.2d 1100, 185 N.Y.S.2d 51. 4. Petitioner claims that he must be represented by counsel at the preliminary examination before the magistrate and ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT