People v. De Cabia

Decision Date16 April 1958
Citation10 Misc.2d 923,172 N.Y.S.2d 1004
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York v. Carmen DE CABIA, Gulivo Ugolini, Ignazio Aniello, Edward J. Napolitano, Nicholas Paul Ferrante, Vincent Buffa, Nicholas Conte, Vincent Conte, Frank Ruggiero, and Alfred Fasula, Defendants.
CourtNew York County Court

Frank A. Gulotta, Dist. Atty., of Nassau County, Mineola, for the people.

Blake & Gurlides, Mineola, for defendant, Carmen DeCabia.

PAUL J. WIDLITZ, Judge.

The defendant Carmen DeCabia seeks leave to withdraw his plea of not guilty so as to enable him to demur to the sufficiency of the indictment. The fact that the said defendant is now represented by counsel other than the one who represented him at his arraignment dictates the granting of permission to withdraw the existing plea. The attention of the Court is now directed to that part of defendant's application which demurs to the sufficiency of the indictment. The written demurrer annexed to the moving papers states that the facts alleged in the indictment do not constitute a crime.

The indictment charges a violation of Section 580 of the Penal Law in that the ten defendants, of whom the applicant herein is one, each aiding and abetting the other, unlawfully conspired to commit the crime of bribing a public officer, namely, the Supervisor of the Town of Oyster Bay. It is alleged that the defendants agreed to give to said official the approximate sum of $1,105 to induce him to refrain from any official action which would tend to initiate the operation of a public garbage district of the Town of Oyster Bay and thus permit the defendants, who were engaged in the business of private sanitation collection in said area, to continue their business without public interference.

In furtherance of this conspiracy, the indictment alleges two overt acts:

(1) That the said defendants agreed and planned to give to said public official 40cents per house and that they met, conversed and agreed and planned that they would give, and that defendant Carmen DeCabia would act as agent for the said co-conspirators, and thus induce said official to delay action on the operation of a public garbage district;

(2) That during the month of December, 1955 defendants Ugolini and Buffa gave DeCabia $280.00; Aniello and Ferrante gave him $380.00; Napolitano gave him $320.00; N. and V. Conte gave him $140.00; Ruggiero gave him $85.00; and Fasula gave him an unknown amount, which sums were received and accepted by DeCabia in pursuance and furtherance of the aforesaid agreement.

The indictment is assailed on the ground that the elements of the crime of conspiracy are not sufficiently alleged since the overt acts set forth therein do not meet the statutory requirement that the overt acts constitute acts outside of the conspiracy in furtherance of the objective of the conspiracy.

Section 583 of the Penal Law modified the common law with respect to conspiracy by requiring, in addition to the initial plot to commit an unlawful act, an overt act in furtherance thereof. Thus, in the proof of criminal conspiracy, as defined by this section, two necessary elements must be alleged and proven: (1) the unlawful agreement and (2) an overt act done by one or more of the parties to effect its object (People v. Tavormine, 257 N.Y. 84, 177 N.E. 317, 75 A.L.R. 1405; People v. Collins, 234...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • US v. Private Sanitation Industry Ass'n
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • October 13, 1994
    ...of Donald W. McCormick, dated September 19, 1994 (McCormick Supp. 9/94), ¶ 3. The opinion in People of the State of New York v. DeCabia, 10 Misc.2d 923, 172 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1005-6 (Nassau Co.Ct.1958), aff'd 8 A.D.2d 825, 190 N.Y.S.2d 142 (2d Dept.1959), aff'd 7 N.Y.2d 823, 196 N.Y.S.2d 701, ......
  • People v. Menache
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 30, 1983
    ...Sheldon, supra, 139 N.Y. pp. 265-266, 34 N.E. 785; People ex rel. Conte v. Flood, 53 Misc.2d 109, 277 N.Y.S.2d 697; People v. De Cabia, 10 Misc.2d 923, 924, 172 N.Y.S.2d 1004, affd. 8 A.D.2d 825, 190 N.Y.S.2d 142, affd. 7 N.Y.2d 823, 196 N.Y.S.2d 701, 164 N.E.2d 720; cf.People v. Russo, 57 ......
  • People v. Menache
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • October 1, 1981
    ...an act 'for purposes of carrying out and furthering the unlawful agreement already entered into by all parties concerned,' People v. DeCabia, 10 Misc.2d 923, 925 aff'd. 8 App.Div.2d 825 aff'd. 7 N.Y.2d 823 accord People v. Teeter, 62 App.Div.2d 1158 aff'd. 47 N.Y.2d 1002 and is an overt act......
  • People v. Wisan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1986
    ...N.Y.S.2d 210, affd 47 N.Y.2d 1002, 420 N.Y.S.2d 217, 394 N.E.2d 286; People v. Wolff, 24 A.D.2d 828, 264 N.Y.S.2d 40; People v. DeCabia, 10 Misc.2d 923, 172 N.Y.S.2d 1004, affd. 8 A.D.2d 825, 190 N.Y.S.2d 142, affd. 7 N.Y.2d 823, 196 N.Y.S.2d 701, 164 N.E.2d 720; People v. Hines, 168 Misc. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT