People v. Caguana

• Decision Date: 26 January 2010
• Docket Number: 2008-06133
• Citation: 69 A.D.3d 953,892 N.Y.S.2d 792,2010 NY Slip Op 698
• Parties: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SEGUNDO CAGUANA, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

69 A.D.3d 953 892 N.Y.S.2d 792 2010 NY Slip Op 698 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
SEGUNDO CAGUANA, Appellant. 2008-06133 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. Decided January 26, 2010.

Appeal by the

[69 A.D.3d 954]

defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Bartlett, J.), rendered December 11, 2007, convicting him of predatory sexual assault against a child (two counts), rape in the first degree, criminal sexual act in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), and endangering the welfare of a child, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

"[S]ince the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which thereafter was actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive" (People v Schnoor, 63 AD3d 760 [2009]; see People v Prude, 62 AD3d 914 [2009]; People v De Alvarez, 59 AD3d 732 [2009]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]).

In any event, the sentence was not excessive, and there is nothing in the record which would warrant disturbing the sentence (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

FISHER, J.P., SANTUCCI, DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.