People v. Carson

• Decision Date: 29 December 1950
• Docket Number: Cr. 4551
• Citation: 101 Cal.App.2d 555,225 P.2d 652
• Court: California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
• Parties: PEOPLE v. CARSON.

Page 652

225 P.2d 652

101 Cal.App.2d 555

PEOPLE v. CARSON.

Cr. 4551.

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California.

Dec. 29, 1950.

G. Vernon Brumbaugh, Los Angeles, for appellant.

Fred N. Howser, Atty. Gen., Howard S. Goldin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.

SHINN, Presiding Justice.

Defendant was convicted in a trial to the court of two offenses: (1) for gain or hire, keeping and occupying a store, with books, papers, paraphernalia, etc., for the purpose or recording bets on horse races, and (2) for gain, hire, etc., recording and registering a bet or bets on horse races, in violation of section 337a, subdivisions 2 and 4 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to terms in the county jail to run consecutively and he appeals from the judgments.

Defendant's principal contention is that the evidence was insufficient to prove either offense. There was evidence of the following facts: At the location in question there was a pool hall and bootblack stand on Central Avenue in Los Angeles; at the time of his arrest defendant was asked by the arresting officer, 'Do you own this place', and replied, 'Yes, I am in partnership with a man by the name of Joe Stone.' The officer, one Kubiak, in citizen's clothes, entered the premises with two other officers; he observed and heard defendant talking over a wall telephone but did not understand what he was saying; defendant had two small pieces of paper in his left hand and was looking at them; when he observed the officer he turned his back, stooped down, and tore up the pieces of paper and dropped them to the floor close to his feet where the officer picked them up. The pieces, restored to their original condition, were introduced as People's Exhibit A. Written on them were various numbers and two sets of initials 'J. S.' and 'R. B.'. The officer, whose qualifications as an expert were stipulated to, testified that one of the numbers was the index number of a horse 'Top's Boy', another number indicated a $1.00 win bet, and the initials 'J. S.' were descriptive of the bettor. Another numeral was the index number of a horse 'Take Wing'. The numeral '1' would indicate a $1.00 bet and the initials 'J. S.' were descriptive of the bettor. Two other numbers indicated two other horses running at Santa Anita, the numbers being placed to indicate a parlay from one horse in the sixth race to the other in the eighth race, the bet being a $2.00 bet and the initials 'R. B.' being descriptive of the bettor. Defendant denied that the writing on the paper was his own and declared to the officer that he had never taken a bet. Another police officer, a qualified handwriting expert, made a study of the writing Exhibit A and the writing on a card from the police department files which latter, it was stipulated, contained pencil writing on both sides in the handwriting of defendant. This was introduced as People's Exhibit D. The witness having made a comparison of the writing on Exhibits A and D, testified to an opinion that all the pencil writings were made by the same person. There was also introduced in evidence by the People as Exhibit...