People v. Castro

Decision Date30 May 1985
Citation65 N.Y.2d 683,491 N.Y.S.2d 623
Parties, 481 N.E.2d 255 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos CASTRO, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order affirmed. We agree with the Appellate Division that there was no abuse of discretion in permitting the challenged testimony, 101 A.D.2d 392, 475 N.Y.S.2d 840.

WACHTLER, C.J., and JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE, JJ., concur.

ALEXANDER and TITONE, JJ., took no part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • People v. Brown
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 17, 1990
    ... ... Montanez, 41 N.Y.2d 53, 58, 390 N.Y.S.2d 861, 359 N.E.2d 371 (1976); People v. Gines, 36 N.Y.2d 932, 933, 373 N.Y.S.2d 543, 335 N.E.2d 850 (1975); see also, People v. Castro, 101 A.D.2d 392, 396, 475 N.Y.S.2d 840 (1st Dept.1984), aff'd, 65 N.Y.2d 683, 491 N.Y.S.2d 623, 481 N.E.2d 255 (1985), it was simply unnecessary here and constituted an abuse of discretion. People v. LeGrand, 76 A.D.2d 706, 708-709, 431 N.Y.S.2d 850 ... (2nd Dept.1980). The error is of ... ...
  • People v. Catala
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 8, 1993
    ...narrative of events leading to the defendant's arrest (see, People v. Castro, 101 A.D.2d 392, 475 N.Y.S.2d 840, affd. 65 N.Y.2d 683, 491 N.Y.S.2d 623, 481 N.E.2d 255; People v. Muriell, 128 A.D.2d 554, 512 N.Y.S.2d 490), and was "inextricably interwoven" with the description of the arrest (......
  • People v. Beavers
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 14, 1987
    ...Dawson, 50 N.Y.2d 311, 428 N.Y.S.2d 914, 406 N.E.2d 771; People v. Castro, 101 A.D.2d 392, 398, 475 N.Y.S.2d 840, affd. 65 N.Y.2d 683, 491 N.Y.S.2d 623, 481 N.E.2d 255), we find that even if the issue were preserved reversal would not be warranted since the rebuttal evidence was properly re......
  • People v. Miranda
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 9, 1992
    ...and why eavesdropping on defendant was continued (see, People v. Castro, 101 A.D.2d 392, 396, 475 N.Y.S.2d 840, aff'd, 65 N.Y.2d 683, 491 N.Y.S.2d 623, 481 N.E.2d 255). Defendant never moved pursuant to CPL 440.10(1) to set aside the judgment on the basis of ineffective assistance of trial ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT