People v. Castro

Decision Date06 February 1992
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Santo Li CASTRO, Appellant. * Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Michael C. Lynch, Albany, for appellant.

Robert E. Carpenter, Dist. Atty., Catskill, for respondent.

Before MIKOLL, J.P., and YESAWICH, MERCURE, CREW and MAHONEY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene County (Battisti, Jr., J.), rendered May 15, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of assault in the second degree.

The record before us clearly shows that defendant waived his right to appeal as part of a negotiated plea bargain, that the waiver was knowing and voluntary, and that he fully understood the consequences of the waiver (see, People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022; People v. Brown, 160 A.D.2d 1039, 553 N.Y.S.2d 246). In any event, even if it is accepted that under the facts of this case the People were required to notify defendant of identification evidence they intended to use against him, his suppression motion on this question waived any objection concerning the timeliness of such notice (see, CPL 710.30[3]; People v. Bolling, 142 A.D.2d 733, 531 N.Y.S.2d 118, lv. denied 72 N.Y.2d 955, 534 N.Y.S.2d 668, 531 N.E.2d 300; People v. Rivera, 73 A.D.2d 528, 422 N.Y.S.2d 687, affd 53 N.Y.2d 1005, 442 N.Y.S.2d 475, 425 N.E.2d 863). The remaining contentions raised by defendant have been considered and rejected as either being waived or lacking in merit.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

* State Report Title: People v. Li Castro.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Cobian
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 16, 1992
    ...requirement of notice (CPL 710.30[3]; see, People v. Newball, 76 N.Y.2d 587, 590, 561 N.Y.S.2d 898, 563 N.E.2d 269; People v. Li Castro, 180 A.D.2d 840, 579 N.Y.S.2d 245). The People established at the hearing that Dillon knew defendant prior to the drug sales at issue and that the sole pur......
  • People v. Lewis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 18, 1993
    ...for preclusion was lodged, thus effectively waiving defendant's right to object to the improper notice (see, People v. Li Castro, 180 A.D.2d 840, 841, 579 N.Y.S.2d 245, lv. denied 80 N.Y.2d 834, 587 N.Y.S.2d 918, 600 N.E.2d 645; People v. Holmes, 170 A.D.2d 534, 535, 566 N.Y.S.2d 93, lv. de......
  • People v. Betancur
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 17, 1994
    ...understood the consequences of the waiver (see, People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022; People v. Li Castro, 180 A.D.2d 840, 579 N.Y.S.2d 245, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 834, 587 N.Y.S.2d 918, 600 N.E.2d ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. MIKOLL, J.P., and WHITE and ......
  • Daby v. Frasca
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 6, 1992
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT