People v. Cerio
| Decision Date | 30 June 1970 |
| Citation | 312 N.Y.S.2d 596,34 A.D.2d 1095 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James John CERIO, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Lowery & Mancuso, Tony Mancuso, Syracuse, for appellant.
John J. Nicit, Dist. Atty., Waterloo, for respondent.
Before GOLDMAN, P.J., and DEL VECCHIO, WITMER, GABRIELLI and BASTOW, JJ.
Upon his plea of guilty to the fourth count only of his indictment, to wit, sodomy in the recond degree in violation of Penal Law, section 130.45, that is, engaging in deviate sexual intercourse with a person less than 14 years old, defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment for a maximum of seven years. Defendant's acts were done with the knowledge of the child's father and mother, who pled guilty, respectively, to promoting prostitution in the first degree and endangering the morals of a child. The parents were both sentenced on the same day that sentence was pronounced upon defendant, the father being sentenced to an indeterminate term of 15 years' imprisonment and the mother to a one year term of imprisonment in the Seneca County jail. Defendant contends that the serious nature of his crime should be treated with less severity because he was encouraged in it by the parents, that the offenses of the parents so aroused the court's ire that an excessive sentence was given to him, and also that under his circumstances, the punishment is not corrective nor beneficial to society but is vindictive.
We find nothing in the record to support defendant's contention that he was enticed into his offensive conduct, and nothing in mitigation of the seriousness thereof. Any ire exhibited by the sentencing judge was fully understandable. The probation report, however, reveals that defendant, a man 60 years of age, is industrious, has a good job and conscientiously supports his family, and that he is of sound mind and is not a danger to the community. Imprisonment, therefore, should be meted out with a view to 'the rehabilitation of the defendant as a useful and responsible member of the community' (People v. Silver, 10 A.D.2d 274, 276, 199 N.Y.S.2d 254, 256; and see People v. Cotter, 25 A.D.2d 609, 267 N.Y.S.2d 679). Under the circumstances of this defendant we find in the exercise of our discretion that the sentence imposed is excessive and that imprisonment for an indeterminate term not to exceed three years is appropriate (Penal Law, § 70.00, subd. 2(d); ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Pacella
...law' (People v. Holcombe, 34 A.D.2d 728, 311 N.Y.S.2d 796; and see People v. Pitsley, 37 A.D.2d 905, 325 N.Y.S.2d 451; People v. Cerio, 34 A.D.2d 1095, 312 N.Y.S.2d 596; People v. Houston, 31 A.D.2d 777, 297 N.Y.S.2d 349). The contentions in this case involve serious questions of law, and w......
-
People v. Pitsley
...a careful consideration of the record and the law' (People v. Holcombe, 34 A.D.2d 728, 311 N.Y.S.2d 796; see also People v. Cerio, 34 A.D.2d 1095, 1096, 312 N.Y.S.2d 596, 597 and People v. Houston, 31 A.D.2d 777, 297 N.Y.S.2d Judgment unanimously affirmed. ...
-
People v. Mastropolo
...responsible member of the community' (People v. Silver, 10 A.D.2d 274, 276 and see People v. Cotter, 25 A.D.2d 609 (People v. Cerio, 34 A.D.2d 1095, 1096, 312 N.Y.S.2d 596). In my view, the majority is imposing imprisonment upon this defendant, not for the purpose of rehabilitation, but mer......