People v. Cianfarani
Decision Date | 03 February 2011 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Guiseppe CIANFARANI, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
81 A.D.3d 998
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Guiseppe CIANFARANI, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb. 3, 2011.
Kouray & Kouray, Schenectady (Steven X. Kouray of counsel), for appellant.
Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.
Before: CARDONA, P.J., SPAIN, ROSE, KAVANAGH and EGAN JR., JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Giardino, J.), rendered November 17, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree.
In satisfaction of a six-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted robbery in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Under the terms of the plea agreement, County Court did not make any promises with respect to sentencing, but advised defendant that he could be sentenced to as little as probation or as much as seven years in prison. County Court subsequently sentenced defendant to three years in prison, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.
Defendant contends that the sentence imposed by County Court was harsh and excessive. Because we find that County Court did not adequately distinguish defendant's waiver of appeal from those rights he was automatically forfeiting by his guilty plea, we conclude that his waiver of appeal was not valid and does not preclude his challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256-257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006]; People v. Cain, 29 A.D.3d 1157, 1157, 814 N.Y.S.2d 417 [2006] ). Although this was defendant's first criminal offense, the circumstances giving rise to it were quite serious. Defendant
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Pimentel
...Veras, 103 A.D.3d 984, 985, 959 N.Y.S.2d 463 [2013],lv. denied21 N.Y.3d 947, 968 N.Y.S.2d 9, 990 N.E.2d 143 [2013];People v. Cianfarani, 81 A.D.3d 998, 999, 916 N.Y.S.2d 650 [2011] ). Moreover, no mention was made on the record during the course of the allocution concerning the waiver of de......
-
People v. Weis
...110 A.D.3d 1248, 1249, 973 N.Y.S.2d 442 [2013], lvs denied 22 N.Y.3d 1140, 983 N.Y.S.2d 499, 6 N.E.3d 618 [2014] ; People v. Cianfarani, 81 A.D.3d 998, 999, 916 N.Y.S.2d 650 [2011]...
-
People v. Iii
...his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v. Wicks, 83 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 920 N.Y.S.2d 488 [2011]; People v. Thomas, 81 A.D.3d at 998, 916 N.Y.S.2d 648; People v. Singh, 73 A.D.3d 1384, 1384–1385, 901 N.Y.S.2d 428 [2010], lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 809, 908 N.Y.S.2d 169, 934 N.E.......
-
People v. Thomas
...to probation, defendant was warned that a prison term of up to 1 1/2 years could be imposed if he continued to use illicit substances such81 A.D.3d 998as marihuana, failed to comply with supervised release requirements or did not appear for sentencing. Defendant failed to abide by those con......