People v. Cintron
Decision Date | 25 July 2006 |
Docket Number | No. 7862/87 ,7862/87 |
Citation | 2006 NY Slip Op 26301,827 N.Y.S.2d 445,13 Misc.3d 833 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. ELIEZER CINTRON, NELSON CORDERO, DWAYNE GLOVER, MARKO IVESIC and FRANCIS JACKSON, Defendants-Petitioners. |
Court | New York Supreme Court |
Legal Aid Society, New York City (Mitchell J. Briskey of counsel), for Eliezer Cintron, defendant.
Pierre Sussman, Bronx, for Nelson Cordero and Dwayne Glover, defendants.
Angel Perez, Tarrytown, for Marko Ivesic, defendant.
Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Margaret E. Knight of counsel), for Francis Jackson, defendant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Jill Starishevsky of counsel), for plaintiff.
The above-captioned cases are joined together for decision. The five named petitioners seek to be relieved of the obligation to register as sex offenders pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act1 ( ). Each petitioner claims that SORA is unconstitutional as applied to him.2 The People oppose petitioners' applications for exemption from the registration requirements of SORA. The New York State Attorney General's office was notified of the Jackson and Cintron motions and declined to take a position.
Eliezer Cintron was convicted of criminal possession of cocaine, unlawful imprisonment, endangering the welfare of a child and misdemeanor assault. He kept his girlfriend and her two children prisoners in her apartment. Although no sexual behavior was alleged, unlawful imprisonment of a child by a nonparent is one of the crimes subject to SORA.3
Nelson Cordero was convicted of burglary in the first degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree. He broke into the home of his former common-law wife. After forcing his son and another 15-year-old boy into the bathroom, Cordero tied up the 15-year-old boy with wire rope. There was no allegation that the boy was harmed sexually in any way, but Cordero is considered a "sex offender" for SORA purposes.
Dwayne Glover was convicted of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree. He entered an apartment armed with a loaded gun and imprisoned the occupants for about seven hours. Present in the apartment were two women, a 12-year-old girl and a six-year-old boy. Glover directed all of them to lie on the bedroom floor. No sexual contact was alleged but unlawful imprisonment of a minor by a nonparent requires registration under SORA.
Marko Ivesic pleaded guilty to kidnapping in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree. He broke into the home of his brother-in-law, with whom his estranged wife was living. When Ivesic's wife, her sister and three children arrived home, he pointed a loaded shotgun at them, handcuffed his wife and made her lie face down on the floor. He told her that he intended to kill the entire family. He also pointed the shotgun at his brother-in-law and his niece. Ivesic had no sexual contact with any of the seven people he held at gunpoint, but both kidnapping in the second degree4 and unlawful imprisonment of a minor by a nonparent require registration under SORA.
Francis Jackson was convicted of promoting prostitution in the second degree and attempted kidnapping in the second degree. Jackson and his girlfriend forced two women to engage in prostitution over the course of several days. He kidnapped the son of one of the women to compel her to continue prostituting herself. There was no claim that Jackson either perpetrated or intended to commit any kind of sexual misconduct upon the child. However, attempted kidnapping in the second degree of a child by a nonparent is included in SORA's definition of "sex offense."
In 1989, Jacob Wetterling, an 11-year-old boy, was riding his bike home with his brother Trevor and a friend named Aaron. A masked man with a gun approached and ordered the boys to lie face down on the ground. The man asked each of the boys their age. After they responded, the man told Trevor and Aaron to run into the woods and not look back or they would be shot. When Aaron and Trevor glanced back, they saw the masked man grab Jacob's arm. Once they reached the wooded area, they turned to find that Jacob and the man were gone. Jacob Wetterling has never been found.
In response to their son's kidnapping, Jacob's parents formed the Jacob Wetterling Foundation, an advocacy group for children's safety. The Foundation's mission, stated on its Web site,5 is to protect children from sexual exploitation and abduction. In 1994, the Wetterlings, along with other interested individuals and groups, successfully lobbied Congress to pass what is commonly known as "the Jacob Wetterling Act" (hereinafter referred to as JWA).6
The objectives of JWA are set out in a report of the Committee on the Judiciary to the House of Representatives:
JWA requires every state to adopt a registration program for sexual predators, sexually violent offenders and persons convicted of a criminal offense against a minor. "[C]riminal offense against a victim who is a minor" is defined to mean any offense specified by state law comparable to kidnapping or false imprisonment of a minor, other than by a parent. (42 USC § 14071 [a] [3] [A] [i], [ii].)
JWA directs the Attorney General to establish guidelines for state programs implementing the provisions of the law. Those guidelines, adopted in 1996, provide:
JWA and the federal guidelines adopted pursuant to JWA thus mandate that kidnapping and unlawful imprisonment of a minor by a nonparent be included in any state registration program. The guidelines further provide that although states are free to make other offenses subject to registration, they must at least incorporate the offenses designated in JWA. (61 Fed Reg at 15112, reprinted in 1996 WL 153812.)
SORA was passed by the New York Legislature in 1995 and became effective January 21, 1996. Section 1 of the law enacting SORA, entitled "Legislative purpose or findings," states:
In accordance with the Legislature's intent to comply with JWA's mandate, SORA defines "sex offense" to include conviction of or an attempt to commit unlawful imprisonment (Penal Law §§ 135.05, 135.10) and kidnapping (Penal Law §§ 135.20, 135.25) where the victim is less than 17 and defendant is not the victim's parent (Correction Law § 168-a [2] [a] [i]). Sexual contact or motivation is not an element of these crimes.8
SORA provides three levels of registration and notification depending on the risk of reoffending. Level one, the lowest level, requires local law enforcement to be notified of an offender's whereabouts (Correction Law § 168-l [6] [a]). Level two is assigned to sex offenders with a moderate risk of committing another sex offense. It allows local law enforcement agencies to disseminate information about an offender to any entity with a vulnerable population. Those entities, in turn, may disclose such information at their discretion. The information includes the name and photograph of the offender, his approximate address and the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The State of Ohio v. BODYKE
...on requiring states to implement a registry of sex offenders and those who commit crimes against children. People v. Cintron (2006), 13 Misc.3d 833, 836, 827 N.Y.S.2d 445, fn. 6. Two years after its enactment, the Act was amended to require that states add community-notification provisions.......
-
State v. Smith, 2008AP1011-CR.
...a nexus between child abductions and sexual offenses, and a majority of states have enacted similar legislation.24 See People v. Cintron, 13 Misc.3d 833, 827 N.Y.S.2d 445, 455-56 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. 2006), aff'd, People v. Knox, 12 N.Y.3d 60, 875 N.Y.S.2d 828, 903 N.E.2d 1149 (2009) (The legislati......
-
People v. Johnson
... ... See, e.g., Gunderson v. Hvass, 339 F.3d 639 (8th Cir. 2003); In re T.T., 188 N.J. 321, 907 A.2d 416 (2006); State v. Sakobie, 165 N.C.App. 447, 598 S.E.2d 615 (2004); State v. Brown, 273 Wis.2d 785, 680 N.W.2d 833 (App.2004) (table). We find People v. Cintron, 13 Misc.3d 833, 827 N.Y.S.2d 445 (Sup.Ct., Bronx County), a recent lower court opinion from New York, particularly well reasoned. Cintron involved five unrelated cases in which defendants were convicted of either kidnapping or unlawful imprisonment and required to register under that state's ... ...
-
State v. Coleman, 2 CA–CR 2015–0419
...that legislation intended to bring New York into compliance with [the JWA] shares that basis."), quoting 385 P.3d 424People v. Cintron , 13 Misc.3d 833, 827 N.Y.S.2d 445, 457 (Sup. Ct. 2006) (second alteration in Johnson ).¶ 13 When Congress was considering the JWA, one representative state......