People v. Clemons
| Decision Date | 17 June 1975 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Roy CLEMONS, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
S. M. Lynch, New York City, for respondent.
C. B. Kende, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Before STEVENS, P.J., and MARKEWICH, KUPFERMAN, MURPHY and LUPIANO, JJ.
Judgment of conviction, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered April 26, 1973, unanimously reversed, in the exercise of discretion and the interest of justice, and the case remanded for a new trial. Of the various errors claimed by defendant-appellant, three stand out to the extent that their sum cannot be deemed harmless in possible effect. An irrelevant statement by defendant as to the availability of cocaine was characterized by the court in the charge as an admission. Testimony was permitted by a detective concerning the hearsay statement made by an unidentified person two days after the arrest at the bar which was its scene, connected with defendant by the latter's involvement with the same person a few moments later. Though excused as corroborative of the questioned identification of defendant, the statement and description of the surrounding circumstances were calculated to give the impression of a large-scale narcotic operation of which the unknown person was the ringleader. The last of the three errors was the inexcusable inflammatory statement in the prosecutor's summation adjuring the jury to save their sympathy 'for the parent whose child buys the first shot of heroin.' In our view, defendant was thereby deprived of a fair trial.
The other claimed errors have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Ivey
...in his summation to inject sympathy for the victim. (See People v. Range, 49 A.D.2d 832, 833, 373 N.Y.S.2d 573; People v. Clemons, 48 A.D.2d 802, 369 N.Y.S.2d 445). Neither can we condone the prosecutor's disparagement of defendant's alibi witnesses by referring to their testimony as "lies,......
-
People v. Grice
...condemned (People v. Ivey, 83 A.D.2d 788, 789, 443 N.Y.S.2d 452; People v. Range, 49 A.D.2d 832, 833, 373 N.Y.S.2d 573; People v. Clemons, 48 A.D.2d 802, 369 N.Y.S.2d 445). The prosecutor also repeatedly vouched for the credibility of his witnesses and improperly called upon the authority o......
-
People v. Rivera
...objections. (See People v. Defense, 51 A.D.2d 924, 381 N.Y.S.2d 90; People v. Range, 49 A.D.2d 832, 373 N.Y.S.2d 573; People v. Clemons, 48 A.D.2d 802, 369 N.Y.S.2d 445; wherein this court has previously condemned prosecutorial attempts to inject sympathy for others into criminal Finally, t......
-
People v. Morales
...parents, of death coming to 'anyone's son or daughter' who might have made the purchase instead of the officer. (See People v. Clemons, 48 A.D.2d 802, 369 N.Y.S.2d 445.) He did not spare defense counsel, whom he accused, in effect, of having invented an entrapment defense 'when all other do......