People v. Cohen
| Decision Date | 15 October 1969 |
| Citation | 61 Misc.2d 858,306 N.Y.S.2d 788 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Kenneth A. COHEN, Bruce Pellman, Sheldon W. Raskin and Frank Weiner, a/k/a Frank Wiener, Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term |
William Cahn, Dist. Atty. (Gino Papa, Mineola, of counsel), for appellant.
William G. Kerwick, Jamaica, for Sheldon W. Raskin, respondent.
Joseph F. Soviero, Jr., Jamaica, for Kenneth A. Cohen, Respondent.
Jesse Moss, New York City, for Bruce Pellman, respondent.
Wiener & Cohen, Freeport, for Frank Wiener, respondent.
Before GULOTTA, P.J., and GLICKMAN and PITTONI, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed. The sole argument presented by the People upon this appeal is that the search was incidental to a lawful arrest. The arrest, however, followed the search which was itself illegal.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
State v. Rodriguez
...F.Supp. 777, 786 (W.D. Mich. 1975) ; People v. Cohen , 57 Misc.2d 366, 292 N.Y.S.2d 706, 713 (Dist. Ct. 1968), aff'd , 61 Misc.2d 858, 306 N.Y.S.2d 788 (Sup. Ct. 1969). The student is the tenant, the college the landlord. As the court of appeals put it: "Appellee enjoyed the same Fourth Ame......
-
Piazzola v. Watkins
...this search was unreasonable. In a case where the facts were similar, People v. Cohen, 57 Misc.2d 366, 292 N.Y.S.2d 706, aff'd, 61 Misc.2d 858, 306 N.Y.S.2d 788, Judge Burstein "The police and the Hofstra University officials admitted that they entered the room in order to make an arrest, i......
-
Fox v. Board of Trustees of State University of New York, 117
...This has also been the law of New York, at least as expressed in People v. Cohen, 57 Misc.2d 366, 292 N.Y.S.2d 706 (Dist.Ct.1968), aff'd, 61 Misc.2d 858, 306 N.Y.S.2d 788 (Sup.Ct.1969). RALPH, the SUNY/Cortland student informational booklet, recognizes that students in dormitory rooms, like......
-
Patterson v. State
...F. Supp. 777, 786 (W.D. Mich. 1975); People v. Cohen, 57 Misc. 2d 366, 292 N.Y.S.2d 706, 713 (Dist. Cr. 1968), aff'd, 61 Misc.2d 858, 306 N.Y.S.2d 788 (Sup. Ct. 1969). The student is the tenant, the college the landlord. As the court of appeals put it: "Appellee enjoyed the same Fourth Amen......
Request a trial to view additional results