People v. Comfort
Decision Date | 18 February 1986 |
Citation | 500 N.Y.S.2d 1031,67 N.Y.2d 760 |
Parties | , 491 N.E.2d 288 People v. Comfort (Larry) |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
To continue reading
Request your trial11 cases
-
People v. Madore
...275 ; Goley, 113 A.D.3d at 1084, 977 N.Y.S.2d 847 ; see generally People v. Comfort, 113 A.D.2d 420, 425, 496 N.Y.S.2d 857, lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 760, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1031, 491 N.E.2d 288 ). Defendant contends that his conviction of assault in the first degree must be reversed because it was ba......
-
People v. Brewer
... ... Murphy, 128 A.D.2d 177, 185, 515 N.Y.S.2d 895, lv. granted 70 N.Y.2d 659, 518 N.Y.S.2d 1054, 512 N.E.2d 580; People v. Comfort, 113 A.D.2d 420, 426, 496 N.Y.S.2d 857, lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 760, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1031, 491 N.E.2d 288). In any event, any possible error in the questioned charge was corrected when County Court gave a second reading of the charge to the jury ... We have reviewed defendant's ... ...
-
People v. Kopera
... ... denied 77 N.Y.2d 882, 568 N.Y.S.2d 925, 571 N.E.2d 95). Although the charge on justification was inadequate, that inadequacy does not warrant reversal in the interest of justice because there was strong evidence of guilt to rebut defendant's justification defense (see, People v. Comfort, 113 A.D.2d 420, 426, 496 N.Y.S.2d 857, lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 760, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1031, 491 N.E.2d 288; People v. Swinson, 111 A.D.2d 275, 276-277, 489 N.Y.S.2d 111, lv. denied 66 N.Y.2d 922, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1038, 489 N.E.2d 783; People v. Gutierrez, 105 A.D.2d 754, 481 N.Y.S.2d 405; People v ... ...
-
People v. Barnes
... ... United States, (D.C.Cir.), 293 F. 1013) on the admissibility of evidence of blood spatter interpretation. Such evidence has long been deemed reliable (see, e.g., People v. Murray, 147 A.D.2d 925, 537 N.Y.S.2d 399, lv. denied 73 N.Y.2d 1019, 541 N.Y.S.2d 773, 539 N.E.2d 601; People v. Comfort, 113 A.D.2d 420, 428, 496 N.Y.S.2d 857, lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 760, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1031, 491 N.E.2d 288) ... Contrary to defendant's contention, the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the probative value of an autopsy photograph used by the witness to explain her ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results