People v. O'Connor

Decision Date17 November 1931
Citation178 N.E. 762,257 N.Y. 473
PartiesPEOPLE v. O'CONNOR.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

James J. O'Connor was convicted of resisting an officer while ‘in the performance of his duty.’ The conviction was affirmed by the Schenectady County Court, and he appeals.

Reversed, and information dismissed.

Appeal from Schenectady County Court.

W. D. Smith, of Schenectady, for appellant.

Roy W. Peters, Dist. Atty., of Schenectady (J. W. Collamer, of Schenectady, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction was for the crime of resisting an officer while ‘in the performance of his duty,’ under section 1825 of the Penal Law (Consol. Laws, c. 40). The arrest of the prisoner was for the commission of a misdemeanor. This crime had not been committed in the presence of the arresting officer; nor did the officer hold a warrant for the arrest. Therefore the arrest was illegally made; the officer had no right to search the prisoner; the prisoner did not resist an officer in the performance of any duty; and no crime was committed.

The judgments should be reversed, and the information dismissed.

CARDOZO, C. J., and POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, and HUBBS, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • People v. Brukner
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • December 31, 2015
    ...an unauthorized action. People v. Vogel, 116 Misc.2d 332, 457 N.Y.S.2d 666 (App.Term, 2d Dept.1982), citing People v. O'Connor, 257 N.Y. 473, 178 N.E. 762 (1931). Additionally, a defendant cannot be convicted of Resisting Arrest when the arrest is unauthorized. People v. Peacock, 68 N.Y.2d ......
  • People v. McErlean
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • October 31, 1962
    ...and seizure incident to an arrest for a misdemeanor denotes a search and seizure after the arrest and not before it. (People v. O'Connor, 257 N.Y. 473, 178 N.E. 762; People v. Yarmosh, 11 N.Y.2d 397, 400, 230 N.Y.S.2d 185, 187, 184 N.E.2d 165, 166; People v. Moore, 11 N.Y.2d 271, 228 N.Y.S.......
  • Houghton v. Culver
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • September 21, 2006
    ...of an official function unless it be proved that the official function was an authorized one"); see also People v. O'Connor, 257 N.Y. 473, 474, 178 N.E. 762 (1931) (warrantless arrest of defendant for a misdemeanor not committed in the presence of the arresting officer was illegally made, a......
  • People v. LeClair
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • January 23, 2019
    ...in the performance of an official function unless it be proved that the official function was an authorized one (see People v. O'Connor , 257 NY 473, 178 N.E. 762 ; People v. Richter , 265 App.Div. 767, 40 N.Y.S.2d 751 ; People v. Ailey , 76 Misc 2d 589, 350 N.Y.S.2d 981 ). When the officia......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT