People v. Cooper
Decision Date | 12 April 2022 |
Docket Number | A161632 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AARON COOPER, Defendant and Appellant. |
Court | California Court of Appeals |
Superior Court of the County of Alameda, No. 125227A, Hon James P. Cramer Judge.
Counsel for Defendant and Appellant: Alex Coolman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal.
Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent: Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey M. Laurence, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Bruce L. Ortega, Deputy Attorney General, René A. Chacón, Supervising Deputy Attorney General. Bridget Billeter, Deputy Attorney General.
In 2004, a jury convicted defendant Aaron Cooper of first degree murder and kidnapping based on his participation with two other men, Fredrick Cross and Miltonous Kingdom, in the 1995 killing of William Highsmith. The jury also found true that a principal was armed with a firearm during both offenses, but it acquitted Cooper of the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm. After Cooper admitted various prior convictions, he was sentenced to 58 years to life in prison. This division affirmed the judgment in 2007. (People v. Cooper (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 500 (Cooper I).)
Over a decade later, in January 2019, Cooper filed a petition for relief under Penal Code[1] section 1170.95. That statute was enacted as part of Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 1437), which altered liability for murder under the theories of felony murder and natural and probable consequences. Under section 1170.95, eligible defendants may petition to have their murder convictions vacated and be resentenced.[2] In the petition, Cooper alleged he was convicted of felony murder and could no longer be convicted of murder under amended section 189.
After appointing counsel for Cooper and considering the parties' briefing, the trial court found he had made a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief and issued an order to show cause. The parties did not submit any "new or additional evidence" as authorized under section 1170.95, subdivision (d)(3). Instead, relying primarily on Cooper I and the trial transcripts, the court found beyond a reasonable doubt that Cooper was "a major participant" in the underlying kidnapping and acted "with reckless indifference to human life" under amended section 189, subdivision (e)(3), precluding relief under section 1170.95. The court came to this conclusion based in part on its belief that Cooper possessed and fired a gun.
On appeal, Cooper claims that it was improper for the trial court to rely at all on such a belief given his acquittal of the firearm-possession offense. We agree.[3] We hold that a trial court cannot deny relief in a section 1170.95 proceeding based on findings that are inconsistent with a previous acquittal when no evidence other than that introduced at trial is presented. Thus, we reverse the order denying the petition and remand for the court to hold a new hearing to consider whether the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Cooper was ineligible for relief under section 1170.95 for reasons other than having used or possessed a firearm.[4]
We begin with a brief overview of the proceedings culminating in the sentence Cooper is serving. Highsmith was killed in August 1995, and the following year Cooper and Cross were jointly tried. (Cooper I, supra, 149 Cal.App.4th at pp. 505-506.) A jury convicted Cooper of murder, kidnapping, and other crimes, and he was sentenced to 71 years to life in prison. (Ibid.) Several years later, after unsuccessfully appealing to this court, he obtained federal habeas relief on the basis that the admission of Kingdom's out-of-court statement violated the Confrontation Clause.[5] (Id. at pp. 506-507; Cooper v. McGrath (N.D.Cal. 2004) 314 F.Supp.2d 967, 985, 988.)
Cooper was retried in the fall of 2004. The jury convicted him of one count of first degree murder and one count of kidnapping and found true that a principal was armed with a firearm during both offenses.[6] But Cooper- who was stipulated to be a convicted felon-was acquitted of a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm.[7] (Cooper I, supra, 149 Cal.App.4th at p. 505, fn. 2.) He then admitted to four prior convictions, one of which was for a serious felony and for which he served a prior prison term, and another for which he also served a prior prison term.[8] (Ibid.)
In December 2004, the trial court sentenced Cooper to a total term of 58 years to life in prison, composed of a term of 25 years to life, doubled, for murder, plus one year for the arming enhancement, and consecutive terms of five years for the prior serious felony and one year each for the prior prison terms. The upper term of nine years for kidnapping plus one year for the arming enhancement was imposed and stayed. Cooper appealed and filed an accompanying petition for writ of habeas corpus, and in spring 2007 this division affirmed the judgment and denied the habeas petition. (Cooper I, supra, 149 Cal.App.4th at pp. 505, 528, fn. 23.)
Witnesses had observed the abduction of Highsmith by three men at the intersection of 12th and Market Streets in Oakland on August 3, 1995. That morning, Zanetta Hodges talked with Highsmith, whom she had known most of her life, in the common area behind her residence in West Oakland. Highsmith told Hodges that he intended to 'beat up the person' who had accused him of stealing a car. Highsmith added that he 'was going to meet' with people 'at the store' to discuss the stolen car accusation.
To continue reading
Request your trial