People v. Cotto
| Decision Date | 28 December 1995 |
| Citation | 635 N.Y.S.2d 623,222 A.D.2d 345 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Roberto COTTO, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
S. Feldman, for Respondent.
P.S. Laisure, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before MURPHY, P.J., and ELLERIN, KUPFERMAN, ASCH and MAZZARELLI, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rose Rubin, J.), rendered June 19, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of murder in the second degree, and one count each of attempted murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 17 years to life on the murder convictions, 8 1/3 to 25 years on the attempted murder, weapon possession and robbery convictions, and 2 1/3 to 7 years on the assault conviction, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial by testimony regarding a threatening visit by one of defendant's associates to a witness's home the day after the prosecutor announced, unbeknownst to the witness, that she was scheduled to testify at trial. The visitor, accompanied by a pit bull, appeared at 8 o'clock that morning at the door of the apartment that the witness shared with her nine year old daughter and her female roommate. He remained there for about fifteen minutes, during which time he informed her that he had received a phone call from "Robert" stating that the witness was scheduled to testify and that her testimony "could send him to jail". She in turn tried to assure the visitor that she would not testify against defendant. Such testimony, however, was properly received in evidence inasmuch as the jury could have found such visit and its implied threat to have been circumstantially connected to defendant and could fairly infer that it might have some tendency to prove consciousness of guilt (People v. Plummer, 36 N.Y.2d 161, 164, 365 N.Y.S.2d 842, 325 N.E.2d 161; People v. Griffin, 126 A.D.2d 743, 744, 511 N.Y.S.2d 136).
The record supports the hearing court's finding that at the Wade hearing, the People met their initial burden of demonstrating "the reasonableness of the police conduct and the lack of any undue suggestiveness" (People v. Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, 335, 553 N.Y.S.2d 72, 552 N.E.2d 608, cert. denied 498 U.S. 833, 111 S.Ct. 99, 112 L.Ed.2d 70). That the witness "kn[ew] defenda...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Christiani
...that they were “hoping that [the witness] wasn't testifying” ( see People v. Spruill, 299 A.D.2d 374, 750 N.Y.S.2d 312;People v. Cotto, 222 A.D.2d 345, 635 N.Y.S.2d 623). During jury selection, the County Court properly denied the defendant's challenge pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky (476 U.......
-
People v. Green
...infer the defendant's ‘consciousness of guilt’ ” ( People v. Myrick, 31 A.D.3d 668, 669, 818 N.Y.S.2d 287, quoting People v. Cotto, 222 A.D.2d 345, 345, 635 N.Y.S.2d 623; see People v. Kornegay, 164 A.D.2d 868, 559 N.Y.S.2d 552). After hearing a recording of a rap performance proffered by t......
-
People v. De Vivo
...907; People v Gonzalez, 253 A.D.2d 674, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 1049; People v Major, 243 A.D.2d 310, 311, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 928; People v Cotto, 222 A.D.2d 345, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 846). We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se appellate brief,......
-
People v. Sampson
...that he would be impervious to police suggestion rendering the display of a single photograph confirmatory (see, e.g., People v. Cotto, 222 A.D.2d 345, 635 N.Y.S.2d 623, app den 88 N.Y.2d 846, 644 N.Y.S.2d 692, 667 N.E.2d 342--the witness told the detective she was present during the murder......