People v. Crawford, Docket No. 73159

Decision Date16 August 1985
Docket NumberDocket No. 73159
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Frank CRAWFORD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. 144 Mich.App. 86, 372 N.W.2d 688
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

[144 MICHAPP 87] Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Louis J. Caruso, Sol. Gen., William F. Lavoy, Pros. Atty., and Lawrence J. VanWasshenova, Asst. Pros. Atty., for the people.

James H. Davies, Monroe, for defendant on appeal.

Before CYNAR, P.J., and BEASLEY and ROBINSON, * JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, M.C.L. Sec. 750.520b(1)(f); M.S.A. Sec. 28.788(2)(1)(f), and assault with intent to commit murder, M.C.L. Sec. 750.83; M.S.A. Sec. 28.278. The Monroe County Circuit Court sentenced defendant to concurrent sentences of from 80 to 120 years for the two convictions. Defendant now appeals his sentences as of right, arguing that the sentences vastly exceeded the sentencing guidelines recommendations and should shock the judicial conscience.

This Court reviews a defendant's sentence to determine whether the trial court, in imposing the sentence, abused its discretion to the extent that it shocks the conscience of the appellate court. People v. Coles, 417 Mich. 523, 550, 339 N.W.2d 440 [144 MICHAPP 88] (1983). The trial court is required by Coles to state on the record the criteria it considered in imposing a sentence. Criteria to be considered in determining an appropriate sentence include: (1) the disciplining of the wrongdoer, (2) the protection of society, (3) the potential for reformation of the offender, and (4) the deterring of others from committing like offenses. Id. The sentence should be tailored to the particular circumstances of the case and of the offender in an effort to balance both society's needs for protection and its interest in maximizing the offender's rehabilitative potential. People v. McFarlin, 389 Mich. 557, 574, 208 N.W.2d 504 (1973). It is error for the trial court to limit its discretion to consider only protection of the community because of the policy for individualized sentencing. People v. Chapa, 407 Mich. 309, 284 N.W.2d 340 (1979).

In the present case, the trial court imposed a prison sentence of 80 to 120 years for each conviction for "your own punishment, and for the protection of society, and incidentally, for whatever rehabilitative effect it may have upon you".

The trial court listed several reasons for these harsh sentences. After stating that defendant's only prior conviction was a misdemeanor assault, the trial court first noted the violence of defendant's crime: defendant raped the victim, then stabbed her 25 times, once in the eye, and left her for dead in a secluded area. The trial court then noted aspects of defendant's character: that defendant customarily carried a large knife and, had he been carrying it at the time of the assault, the victim would be dead; that defendant was trained to kill while in the military service and was boastful of his strength; and that defendant had a bad temper. Finally, the trial court noted the injuries [144 MICHAPP 89] to the victim: that she lost an eye and suffered serious emotional trauma.

Thus, the trial court adequately stated its reasons for the harsh punishment it gave. Although the sentences are 8 to 13 times that suggested by the sentencing guidelines, that alone does not make the sentences shocking, contrary to defendant's assertion. The guidelines were not mandatory at the time of defendant's sentencing and divergence from the guidelines is encouraged where justice so requires. The question is whether his sentences properly balance society's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. Moore
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • January 21, 1988
    ...or for any term of years." M.C.L. Sec. 750.520b(2); M.S.A. Sec. 28.788(2)(2). Another panel of this Court in People v. Crawford, 144 Mich.App. 86, 89, 372 N.W.2d 688 (1985), upheld concurrent sentences of 80 to 120 years for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, noting "[f]rom a defendant's......
  • People v. Badour
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • April 19, 1988
    ...does not have for a purpose another substitute sentence and another subjective exercise of discretion. People v. James Crawford, 144 Mich.App. 86, 89-90, 372 N.W.2d 688 (1985). After reviewing the record, we find no abuse of the trial court's sentencing discretion and our collective conscie......
  • People v. Legree
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • June 26, 1989
    ...Jefferson, 172 Mich.App. 492, 432 N.W.2d 351 (1988); People v. Martinez, 147 Mich.App. 94, 382 N.W.2d 741 (1985); People v. Crawford, 144 Mich.App. 86, 372 NW2d 688 (1985). See also People v. Murray, 72 Mich. 10, 17, 40 N.W. 29 (1888); People v. Robinson, 172 Mich.App. 650, 432 N.W.2d 390 (......
  • People v. Mixon, Docket Nos. 95579
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • September 27, 1988
    ...Cooper, 168 Mich.App. 62, 423 N.W.2d 597 (1988), People v. Harden, 166 Mich.App. 106, 420 N.W.2d 136 (1988), and People v. Crawford, 144 Mich.App. 86, 372 N.W.2d 688 (1985), are some of the later cases upholding such In People v. Oscar Moore, 164 Mich.App. 378, 417 N.W.2d 508 (1987), the ma......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT