People v. Crayon

• Decision Date: 28 April 1988
• Citation: 527 N.Y.S.2d 577,139 A.D.2d 840
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kim CRAYON, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 577

527 N.Y.S.2d 577

139 A.D.2d 840

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kim CRAYON, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division,

Third Department.

April 28, 1988.

Douglas P. Rutnik (Jeanne M. Heran, of counsel), Albany, for appellant.

Sol Greenberg, Dist. Atty. (Michael J. Connolly, of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before KANE, J.P., and WEISS, MIKOLL, YESAWICH and LEVINE, JJ.

YESAWICH, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered July 30, 1986, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of burglary in the third degree.

On the evening of March 5, 1986 and early morning of March 6, 1986, defendant and Larry Hemingway, among others, were patrons at Mackey's Bar in the City of Albany. The bartender closed the bar that morning at approximately 3:45 A.M. That afternoon, upon learning that someone had broken into the bar, the bartender, accompanied by a police detective, investigated the scene. The rear entrance door had been pried open, allowing access to a storeroom. The door between the storeroom and the barroom had a fist-size hole punched through it and blood was found on the door, in puddles on the floor and elsewhere. A trail of blood led across the storeroom, out into an adjoining street and south down the street.

Hearing that he was a suspect, Hemingway came forward with information about the break-in. He reported to Detective Kenneth Kennedy that he heard a loud "boom" while he and others mingled outside the bar after it closed and noticed defendant walk by, coming from a lot near the rear of the bar. Later, Hemingway heard a second "boom" and, looking from his apartment window across the street from the bar, he again saw defendant coming from the direction of the bar's rear, this time wrapping something around his hand.

Kennedy proceeded to defendant's residence without an arrest warrant and, upon finding defendant's arm swathed in a large surgical bandage--defendant claimed he had been cut while working on a car--placed defendant under arrest and read him the Miranda warnings. At the police station, Kennedy informed defendant of Hemingway's statement and also that a call to a hospital revealed defendant had indeed been there the morning of the break-in. At that point defendant orally admitted breaking into the bar.

Following a suppression hearing, County Court ruled the confession admissible. Convicted thereafter of burglary in the third degree, defendant appeals; we affirm.

The overriding issue presented is whether reasonable cause, which in the context of an arrest has the same meaning as probable cause ( see, People v. Johnson, 66 N.Y.2d 398, 402 n. 2, 497 N.Y.S.2d 618, 488 N.E.2d 439; see also, People v. Fields, 50 A.D.2d 870, 376 N.Y.S.2d 943, revd. on other grounds 45 N.Y.2d 986, 413 N.Y.S.2d 112, 385 N.E.2d 1040), existed to arrest defendant without a warrant (see, N.Y. Const., art. I, § 12; CPL 140.10). The primary basis for defendant's arrest was Hemingway's account of what he had observed. In determining whether an informant's tip provides probable cause, the two-prong test set out in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114-115, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 1513-1514, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 413, 89 S.Ct. 584, 587, 21 L.Ed. 637, though abandoned by the United...