People v. Culligan
| Decision Date | 23 December 1980 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Gary CULLIGAN, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Theodore E. Wiggins, Geneseo, for appellant.
Gary Culligan, pro se.
Before SIMONS, J. P., and HANCOCK, SCHNEPP, CALLAHAN and MOULE, JJ.
Defendant has been indicted for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law, § 220.39, subd. 1) and petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.25). After reviewing the Grand Jury minutes, County Court granted defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment for insufficiency and denied the District Attorney's application to resubmit.
The indictment charges that on November 17, 1978 defendant knowingly and unlawfully sold a white powder alleged to be a narcotic drug, cocaine, to an undercover agent for $200. In fact, subsequent laboratory tests established that the white powder was aspirin and therefore the second count of the indictment charged that defendant "with the intent to deprive another of property by false promise" did steal property, $200, from an undercover agent by selling a white powder alleged to be a narcotic drug.
The order dismissing the indictment is reversed and permission to resubmit is granted (CPL 190.75, subd. 3; 210.20, subd. 4). The evidence before the Grand Jury was sufficient, if uncontradicted, to establish an attempt to sell a controlled substance, notwithstanding the fact that the substance actually transferred was aspirin (see People v. Reap, 68 A.D.2d 964, 414 N.Y.S.2d 775; People v. Rosencrants, 89 Misc.2d 721, 392 N.Y.S.2d 808). Nothing in the Grand Jury Minutes establishes that defendant knew the powder was aspirin and if he believed that it was cocaine he may be guilty of an attempt to sell a controlled substance (Penal Law, § 110.10; and see LaFave & Scott, Criminal Law, § 60, pp. 438-442).
The second count of the indictment charging petit larceny was also sufficient. It was not necessary to allege the manner by which the larceny was committed or the various elements of that method of committing the crime (see Penal Law, § 155.45, and Hechtman, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons.Laws of N.Y. Book 39, Penal Law § 155.45, p. 164; People v. Farruggia, 41 A.D.2d 894, 342 N.Y.S.2d 924).
Order unanimously reversed, indictment reinstated and permission to resubmit granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Alameen
...v. Sessions, 181 A.D.2d 842, 843, 581 N.Y.S.2d 107, lv. denied- 80 N.Y.2d 837, 587 N.Y.S.2d 922, 600 N.E.2d 649; People v. Culligan, 79 A.D.2d 875, 876, 434 N.Y.S.2d 546; People v. Reap, 68 A.D.2d 964, 414 N.Y.S.2d 775). Here, however, defendant was charged, tried and convicted not for an a......
-
People v. Sessions
...testified that he thought mushrooms he sold to an undercover officer contained psilocybin, but he was mistaken]; People v. Culligan, 79 A.D.2d 875, 434 N.Y.S.2d 546 [since nothing in Grand Jury minutes established that defendant knew that powder in question was aspirin, he could be prosecut......
-
People v. Acosta
...v. Dlugash, 41 N.Y.2d 725, 395 N.Y.S.2d 419, 363 N.E.2d 1155; People v. Duprey, 98 A.D.2d 110, 469 N.Y.S.2d 702; People v. Culligan, 79 A.D.2d 875, 434 N.Y.S.2d 546; People v. Reap, 68 A.D.2d 964, 414 N.Y.S.2d 775). Criminal liability for an attempted crime rests upon the acts of preparatio......
-
People v. Mike
...the crime of attempting to sell a controlled substance in the third degree (see, Penal Law §§ 110.00, 110.10; People v. Culligan, 79 A.D.2d 875, 876, 434 N.Y.S.2d 546), and the conviction must be reduced accordingly (see, People v. Flores, 196 A.D.2d 882, 883, 602 N.Y.S.2d 167, affd. 84 N.Y......