People v. Dallas

Decision Date09 December 2014
Citation25 N.E.3d 346,24 N.Y.3d 1083,1 N.Y.S.3d 9 (Table)
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesPeople v. Richard Dallas
Opinion

Read

, J.

denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • People v. Watson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 28, 2020
    ... ... Defendant was asked if he felt free to leave, to which he responded affirmatively. When defendant was asked to provide a buccal swab, he likewise agreed to do so (see People v. Dallas, 119 A.D.3d 1362, 1363, 989 N.Y.S.2d 206 [2014], lv denied 24 N.Y.3d 1083, 1 N.Y.S.3d 9, 25 N.E.3d 346 [2014] ). Based on the totality of the circumstances, we find that defendant consented both to being taken to the police station and to submitting to a buccal swab (see People v. Kluge, 180 A.D.3d ... ...
  • People v. Scaringe
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 17, 2016
    ... ... Here, nothing in the investigators' mildly misleading interviewing technique was so deceitful as to undermine the voluntariness of defendant's choice whether to speak with them (see People v. Moore, 132 A.D.3d 496, 496497, 17 N.Y.S.3d 426 [2015] ; People v. Dallas, 119 A.D.3d 1362, 1363, 989 N.Y.S.2d 206 [2014], lv. denied27 N.Y.S.3d 71824 N.Y.3d 1083, 1 N.Y.S.3d 9, 25 N.E.3d 346 [2014] ; People v. Lloyd, 118 A.D.3d 1117, 1119, 987 N.Y.S.2d 672 [2014], lv. denied 25 N.Y.3d 951, 7 N.Y.S.3d 280, 30 N.E.3d 171 [2015] ). Defendant requested an attorney soon ... ...
  • People v. Waite
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 1, 2016
    ...19, 881 N.E.2d 1206 [2008] ; see also People v. Dallas, 119 A.D.3d 1362, 1365–1366, 989 N.Y.S.2d 206 [2014], lv. denied 24 N.Y.3d 1083, 1 N.Y.S.3d 9, 25 N.E.3d 346 [2014] ).Contrary to defendant's argument, the fact that he called and texted a friend several times during the afternoon for a......
  • People v. Hall
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 24, 2020
    ... ... Instead, the jury was justified in concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was aware of and consciously disregarded a grave risk of death to the infant (see Penal Law 15.05[3] ; 120.10[3]; People v. Dallas, 119 A.D.3d 1362, 1366, 989 N.Y.S.2d 206 [4th Dept. 2014], lv denied 24 N.Y.3d 1083, 1 N.Y.S.3d 9, 25 N.E.3d 346 [2014] ). Defendant further asserts that the People did not establish the requisite mens rea component of depraved indifference to human life because he sought assistance for the victim ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT