People v. Davis
| Decision Date | 30 January 1997 |
| Citation | 235 A.D.2d 941,653 N.Y.S.2d 404 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sean DAVIS, also known as Clarence Martin, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Paul Edwards, Albany, for appellant.
Sol Greenberg, District Attorney (John E. Maney, of counsel), Albany, for respondent.
Before CARDONA, P.J., and MERCURE, CASEY, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), rendered August 16, 1995 in Albany County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and forgery in the second degree.
During the early evening hours of October 14, 1994, two City of Albany police officers observed a group of men gathered by a car and a van in a parking lot near the bus station. They observed one of the men pass a bag to defendant, from which defendant removed a large white chunky substance and handed it to a third man who placed it down inside his pants. A fourth man was observed by the officers to be acting as a lookout by glancing around the parking lot as the transfer took place. The men then entered the van, drove away and were followed by the officers who stopped them after a brief pursuit. All four occupants were arrested after the officers found cocaine under a rear seat occupied by the man who had placed the white chunky substance in his pants.
At the police station, defendant identified himself and signed his fingerprint card as Clarence Martin. The police later determined his real identity (Sean Davis) and arrested him for forgery; at his second booking defendant signed the fingerprint card as Sean Davis. Thereafter, defendant was indicted on two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and one count of forgery in the second degree. After a suppression hearing, at which Supreme Court found that the People had satisfied their burden on the issue of probable cause, defendant and the three codefendants were tried before a jury which found defendant guilty of all charges. Supreme Court sentenced defendant as a second felony offender to two concurrent prison sentences of 12 1/2 to 25 years on the narcotics charges and a consecutive sentence of 3 1/2 to 7 years on the forgery charge. Defendant now appeals.
We affirm. Initially we reject defendant's assertion that Supreme Court should have suppressed the contraband seized from the van. The totality of the circumstances as they occurred in the parking lot and as observed by the police officers indicates that there was probable cause for the stop, the search of the van and the subsequent arrest of defendant for possession of narcotics (see, People v. Alexander, 218 A.D.2d 284, 289, 640 N.Y.S.2d 28, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 964, 647 N.Y.S.2d 718, 670 N.E.2d 1350); the transfer of the white chunky substance, the fact that it was placed down inside a codefendant's pants, the observed lookout and all other circumstances surrounding the transfer provided sufficient basis for the experienced police officers to reasonably conclude that the substance was a narcotic (see, id., at 288-289, 640 N.Y.S.2d 28; People v. Graham, 211 A.D.2d 55, 56, 626 N.Y.S.2d 95, lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 795, 632 N.Y.S.2d 508, 656 N.E.2d 607). "Probable cause requires, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt or evidence sufficient to warrant a conviction * * *, but merely information which would lead a reasonable person who possesses the same expertise as the officer to conclude, under the circumstances, that a crime is being or was committed * * * "(People v. McRay, 51 N.Y.2d 594, 602, 435 N.Y.S.2d 679, 416 N.E.2d 1015 [citations omitted] ). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress.
We also reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in permitting expert testimony during the trial on dealing drugs and the trade in Albany. The expert, an investigator with the Albany County Sheriff's office, testified as to the methods used to conceal, transport and consume narcotics, as well as patterns of drug activity near the Albany bus station. In our view the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Casanova
...283 A.D.2d 712, 713, 725 N.Y.S.2d 711 [2001], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 926, 732 N.Y.S.2d 644, 758 N.E.2d 670 [2001] ; People v. Davis, 235 A.D.2d 941, 943, 653 N.Y.S.2d 404 [1997], lvs. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1010, 1013, 658 N.Y.S.2d 248, 680 N.E.2d 622 [1997] ). Indeed, the factors which typically d......
-
People v. Sudler
...officers may testify as experts ( see People v. Hicks, 2 N.Y.3d 750, 751, 778 N.Y.S.2d 745, 811 N.E.2d 7 [2004]; People v. Davis, 235 A.D.2d 941, 943, 653 N.Y.S.2d 404 [1997], lvs. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1010, 1013, 658 N.Y.S.2d 248, 251, 680 N.E.2d 622, 625 [1997] ), no explicit declaration that......
-
People v. Cowan
...v. Berry, 5 A.D.3d 866, 867, 773 N.Y.S.2d 181 [2004], lv denied 3 N.Y.3d 637, 782 N.Y.S.2d 408, 816 N.E.2d 198 [2004] ; People v. Davis, 235 A.D.2d 941, 943, 653 N.Y.S.2d 404 [1997], lvs denied 89 N.Y.2d 1010, 1013, 658 N.Y.S.2d 248, 251, 680 N.E.2d 622, 625 [1997]). The jury was entitled t......
-
People v. Blackman
...the ultimate issues of defendant's intent and knowledge ( see People v. Wright, 283 A.D.2d at 714, 725 N.Y.S.2d 711;People v. Davis, 235 A.D.2d 941, 943, 653 N.Y.S.2d 404 [1997],lv. denied89 N.Y.2d 1010, 658 N.Y.S.2d 248, 680 N.E.2d 622 [1997];cf. People v. Lamont, 227 A.D.2d 873, 875, 643 ......