People v. Delston

Decision Date13 June 2006
Docket Number2004-03478.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER DELSTON, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a second felony offender. The defendant, however, failed to preserve this claim for appellate review since he did not contest or controvert his status as a second felony offender when he had the opportunity to do so at the sentencing hearing (see People v Hamilton, 205 AD2d 706 [1994]; People v Khatib, 166 AD2d 668 [1990]; see also People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961 [1989]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant's contention raised in point three of his brief is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. The defendant's remaining contention raised in point one of his brief is without merit.

Adams, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Drummond
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 12, 2016
    ...265.02(4) was not a predicate violent felony conviction (see People v. Moshier, 110 A.D.3d 832, 833, 972 N.Y.S.2d 675 ; People v. Delston, 30 A.D.3d 536, 818 N.Y.S.2d 223 ). In any event, the Supreme Court properly adjudicated the defendant a persistent violent felony offender (see Penal La......
  • People v. Moshier
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 9, 2013
    ...controvert his status as a second felony offender when he had the opportunity to do so at the sentencing hearing” ( People v. Delston, 30 A.D.3d 536, 536, 818 N.Y.S.2d 223;see People v. Smith, 73 N.Y.2d 961, 540 N.Y.S.2d 987, 538 N.E.2d 339;People v. Miles, 95 A.D.3d 1038, 943 N.Y.S.2d 752)......
  • People v. Winslow
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 28, 2012
    ...v. Smith, 73 N.Y.2d 961, 962, 540 N.Y.S.2d 987, 538 N.E.2d 339;People v. Cullum, 93 A.D.3d 856, 940 N.Y.S.2d 872;People v. Delston, 30 A.D.3d 536, 536, 818 N.Y.S.2d 223;People v. Alston, 289 A.D.2d 339, 734 N.Y.S.2d 583). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit, as the sta......
  • People v. Walker
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 30, 2020
    ...during the sentencing proceeding (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Drummond, 143 A.D.3d 836, 838, 39 N.Y.S.3d 208 ; People v. Delston, 30 A.D.3d 536, 818 N.Y.S.2d 223 ). In any event, the Supreme Court properly adjudicated the defendant a persistent violent felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT