People v. Demosthene

Decision Date29 December 2003
Docket Number2002-04675.
Citation2003 NY Slip Op 20028,2 A.D.3d 874,769 N.Y.S.2d 746
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PIERRE DEMOSTHENE, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's general waiver of his right to appeal was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. Accordingly, appellate review of his contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is precluded except to the extent that it may have affected the voluntariness of the plea (see People v Herring, 274 AD2d 525, 526 [2000]; People v Nicholas, 272 AD2d 629, 630 [2000]).

The defendant also contends that his plea was not knowing or voluntary because he was not completely informed of his sentencing options, and because he was not informed of the immigration consequences of his plea. Since the defendant never moved to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment on these grounds, these contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Aloisi, 177 AD2d 491 [1991]; CPL 470.05 [2]).

Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Milton
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 13, 2013
    ...( see People v. Ramos, 77 A.D.3d 773, 774, 909 N.Y.S.2d 484;People v. Drago, 50 A.D.3d 920, 855 N.Y.S.2d 252;People v. Demosthene, 2 A.D.3d 874, 769 N.Y.S.2d 746). Nevertheless, contrary to the defendant's contention, his attorney provided him with meaningful representation ( see People v. ......
  • People v. Fryer, 2002-03468.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 29, 2003

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT