People v. Diaz
| Decision Date | 11 January 2017 |
| Citation | 2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 00183,46 N.Y.S.3d 627,146 A.D.3d 803 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Angel DIAZ, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
146 A.D.3d 803
46 N.Y.S.3d 627
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 00183
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Angel DIAZ, appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan. 11, 2017.
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan, and Ayelet Sela of counsel; J. Raymond Mechmann III on the brief), for respondent.
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J., RUTH C. BALKIN, SANDRA L. SGROI, and BETSY BARROS, JJ.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), rendered October 15, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a determinate term of imprisonment of 10 years on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, to run concurrently with an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 ½ to 7 years on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, to be followed by a period of 5 years of postrelease supervision. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Lopresto, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree from a determinate term of imprisonment of 10 years to a determinate term of imprisonment of 9 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
When the Supreme Court explained the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal to him, it improperly conflated the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by a plea of guilty. Accordingly, the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Wells, 135 A.D.3d 976, 22 N.Y.S.3d 913 ; People v. Bond, 109 A.D.3d 481, 969 N.Y.S.2d 923 ).
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the gun recovered from his person during a traffic stop. On a motion to suppress physical evidence, the People bear the burden of going forward to establish the legality of police conduct in the first instance (see People v. Whitehurst, 25 N.Y.2d 389, 391, 306 N.Y.S.2d 673, 254 N.E.2d 905 ; People v. Blinker, 80 A.D.3d 619, 620, 915 N.Y.S.2d 593 ; People v. James, 72 A.D.3d 844, 844, 898 N.Y.S.2d 635 ; People v. Hernandez, 40 A.D.3d 777, 778, 836 N.Y.S.2d 219 ). Once the People have met their initial burden, the defendant bears the ultimate burden of proving the illegality of the search and seizure (see People v. Grant, 83 A.D.3d 862, 863, 921 N.Y.S.2d 285 ; People v. Clough, 70 A.D.3d 474, 895 N.Y.S.2d 52 ). The credibility determinations of a hearing court, which saw and heard the witnesses at the suppression hearing, are entitled to deference on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v. Wallace, 128 A.D.3d 866, 866, 7 N.Y.S.3d 610 ; People v. Davis, 103 A.D.3d 810, 811, 962 N.Y.S.2d 174 ).
"As a general matter, the decision to stop an automobile is reasonable where the police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred, even if the underlying reason for the stop was to investigate another...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Watson
... ... Sluszka, 15 A.D.3d 421, 423, 790 N.Y.S.2d 55, quoting People v. Robinson, 97 N.Y.2d 341, 348349, 741 N.Y.S.2d 147, 767 N.E.2d 638 ; see People v. Edwards, 14 N.Y.3d 741, 742, 898 N.Y.S.2d 538, 925 N.E.2d 576 ; People v. Foster, 153 A.D.3d 853, 853, 60 N.Y.S.3d 372 ; People v. Diaz, 146 A.D.3d 803, 804, 46 N.Y.S.3d 627 ). Here, the court properly credited the police officers' testimony that they observed the livery vehicle in which the defendant was a passenger make two turns without signaling, which justified the stop of the vehicle for the commission of a traffic ... ...
-
People v. Biggs
... ... " On a motion to suppress physical evidence, the People bear the burden of going forward to establish the legality of police conduct in the first instance " ( People v. Rowe, 189 A.D.3d 894, 895, 133 N.Y.S.3d 489, quoting People v. Diaz, 146 A.D.3d 803, 804, 46 N.Y.S.3d 627 ). "While great weight must be accorded the credibility findings of the hearing court, this Court has also observed that in assessing credibility we should not discard common sense and common knowledge " ( People v. Harris, 192 A.D.3d 151, 163, 138 N.Y.S.3d ... ...
-
People v. Janvier
... ... Delgado (see People v. Murdock, 175 A.D.3d 1560, 1562, 109 N.Y.S.3d 358 ; People v. Garcia, 170 A.D.3d 883, 886, 96 N.Y.S.3d 106 ; People v. Farrell, 169 A.D.3d 919, 920, 94 N.Y.S.3d 164 ; People v. Diaz, 146 A.D.3d 803, 805, 46 N.Y.S.3d 627 ; People v. Kordish, 140 A.D.3d 981, 33 N.Y.S.3d 434 ).Thus, in determining whether to reduce a sentence pursuant to CPL 470.15(6)(b), this Court need not defer to the sentencing court merely because it has observed the principles of sentencing; rather, this ... ...
-
People v. Velazquez
... ... Ingle , 36 N.Y.2d 413, 369 N.Y.S.2d 67, 330 N.E.2d 39 [1975] [police authorized to stop a motor vehicle without a warrant upon reasonable suspicion to believe a traffic infraction has been committed]; People v. Diaz , 146 A.D.3d 803, 46 N.Y.S.3d 627 [2nd Dept. 2017] [same]; People v. Diaz , 232 A.D.2d 289, 648 N.Y.S.2d 562 [1st Dept. 1996], lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 944, 655 N.Y.S.2d 895, 678 N.E.2d 508 [1997] [same] ). The defendant also argues that the People may not rely on VTL 375 (1) (a) to establish a ... ...