People v. Dickens
| Decision Date | 10 October 1996 |
| Citation | 673 N.E.2d 1237,651 N.Y.S.2d 10,88 N.Y.2d 1031,218 A.D.2d 584 |
| Parties | , 673 N.E.2d 1237 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael DICKENS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Prior report: 218 A.D.2d 584, 630 N.Y.S.2d 737.
MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The grounds defendant now advances for challenging the lawfulness of the search were not presented to the trial court. We therefore conclude that defendant failed to preserve his present claims for this Court's review.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
- Wagner v. City of Schenectady
-
People v. Monahan
...search, the defendant's instant contention in this regard is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Dickens, 88 N.Y.2d 1031, 651 N.Y.S.2d 10, 673 N.E.2d 1237; People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 487 N.Y.S.2d 318, 476 N.E.2d 644; People v. Manuli, 156 A.D.2d 388, 548 N.Y.S.2d 340).......
-
People v. Williams
...505, 555 N.E.2d 902). The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Dickens, 88 N.Y.2d 1031, 651 N.Y.S.2d 10, 673 N.E.2d 1237; People v. Proctor, 79 N.Y.2d 992, 584 N.Y.S.2d 435, 594 N.E.2d 929; People v. Oliver, 63 N.Y.2d 973, 483 N.Y.S.2d 992, ......
- Steel Los III/Goya v. Board of Assessors, 49.
Request a trial to view additional results