People v. Dozier, Docket No. 11361

Decision Date29 February 1972
Docket NumberNo. 2,Docket No. 11361,2
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Calvin DOZIER, Defendant-Appellant
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

E. Thomas Fitzgerald, Owosso, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Gerald M. Stevens, Pros. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LESINSKI, C.J., and McGREGOR and QUINN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was arrested and charged with the crime of assault with intent to commit murder. M.C.L.A. § 750.83; M.S.A. § 28.278. Defendant was convicted at a jury trial of the lesser included offense of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. M.C.L.A. § 750.84; M.S.A. § 28.279.

The petitioner's main defense was that of intoxication, and he requested and the trial judge gave instructions on voluntary intoxication as a defense to the crimes of assault with intent to commit murder, and assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. The defendant also requested an instruction on the lesser crime of felonious assault.

Although the court instructed the jury on the crime of assault with intent to commit murder, and the crime of assault with intent to commit great bodily harm less than murder, the judge refused to give an intoxication instruction on the lesser crime of felonious assault, holding that it was a general intent crime and, therefore, voluntary intoxication could not vitiate the defendant's Mens rea.

This was error on the part of the trial judge. In Michigan, the crime of felonious assault is a specific intent crime. In the case of People v. Crane, 27 Mich.App. 201, 183 N.W.2d 307 (1970), the defendant was convicted of felonious assault and the court held that 'plaintiff concedes that the trial court correctly ruled that felonious assault is a specific intent crime.' In discussing whether or not the defendant was entitled to an instruction, this Court held that:

'While the trial judge may properly infer the requisite specific intent to do physical harm from the fact that a dangerous weapon was used, in the instant case the defendant was, nevertheless, entitled to consideration of his claim that alcohol so overcame his facilities as to negate that finding.' People v. Crane, Supra, 204, 183 N.W.2d, 309.

It must, therefore, be found that the defendant in the instant case was entitled to his requested instruction....

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Starghill, Docket No. 45921
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • September 2, 1980
    ...788 (1973); People v. Richard Johnson, 42 Mich.App. 544, 202 N.W.2d 340 (1972). The cases relied upon by defendant, People v. Dozier, 39 Mich.App. 88, 197 N.W.2d 314 (1972) and People v. Crane, 27 Mich.App. 201, 183 N.W.2d 307 (1970), were anomalous decisions rejected in People v. Rohr and ......
  • People v. Rae, Docket No. 45197
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • November 6, 1980
    ...People v. Counts, 318 Mich. 45, 27 N.W.2d 338 (1947).5 People v. Crane, 27 Mich.App. 201, 183 N.W.2d 307 (1970); People v. Dozier, 39 Mich.App. 88, 197 N.W.2d 314 (1972).6 People v. Johnson, 42 Mich.App. 544, 202 N.W.2d 340 (1972); People v. Rohr, 45 Mich.App. 535, 206 N.W.2d 788 (1973); Pe......
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • August 29, 1972
    ...In support of his position defendant cites People v. Crane, 27 Mich.App. 201, 183 N.W.2d 307 (1970). See, also, People v. Dozier, 39 Mich.App. 88, 197 N.W.2d 314 (1972). While Crane, supra, does hold that felonious assault is a specific intent crime, there is no citation of authority for th......
  • People v. Rohr, Docket No. 12770
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 26, 1973
    ...Defendant erroneously contends that specific intent is an element of the crime of felonious assault. Reliance on People v. Dozier, 39 Mich.App. 88, 197 N.W.2d 314 (1972), and People v. Crane, 27 Mich.App. 201, 183 N.W.2d 307 (1970), is improper as these cases are in error on this point. Thi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT