People v. Espinal

Decision Date26 September 1991
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Benjamin ESPINAL, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

William D. Highland, Ithaca, for appellant.

James T. Hayden, Dist. Atty., Elmira, for respondent.

Before MAHONEY, P.J., and MIKOLL, YESAWICH and MERCURE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.), rendered July 20, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant contends that his guilty plea was not entered into knowingly and intelligently because County Court made no attempt to determine if he understood English. Initially, we note that defendant's failure to move to withdraw his guilty plea or to make a postverdict motion to vacate the judgment of conviction precludes appellate review of the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 487 N.Y.S.2d 318, 476 N.E.2d 644). In any event, there is nothing in the record which indicated that defendant was having trouble understanding the proceedings such that an interpreter was required. Instead, the record establishes that defendant understood the significance and effect of his plea and what rights he was waiving and, therefore, the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made (see, People v. Navarro, 134 A.D.2d 460, 521 N.Y.S.2d 82; People v. Clickner, 128 A.D.2d 917, 512 N.Y.S.2d 572, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 644, 518 N.Y.S.2d 1036, 512 N.E.2d 562).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Mohammed
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 27 d4 Outubro d4 1994
    ...understanding the interpreter or the significance and effect of his plea and the rights that he was waiving (see, People v. Espinal, 176 A.D.2d 417, 574 N.Y.S.2d 406; People v. Martes, 154 A.D.2d 946, 545 N.Y.S.2d 885, lv. denied 75 N.Y.2d 870, 553 N.Y.S.2d 301, 552 N.E.2d 880; People v. Sa......
  • People v. Torres
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 26 d4 Setembro d4 1991
  • People v. Rojas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 d4 Abril d4 1997
    ...5; People v. Hayes, 208 A.D.2d 1054, 617 N.Y.S.2d 574, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 910, 627 N.Y.S.2d 333, 650 N.E.2d 1335; People v. Espinal, 176 A.D.2d 417, 574 N.Y.S.2d 406). In any event, our review of the proceedings in County Court offers no support for defendant's claims that his lack of educ......
  • People v. Serna
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 3 d4 Junho d4 1999
    ...Thus, despite defendant's failure to move to withdraw the plea or seek to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v. Espinal, 176 A.D.2d 417, 418, 574 N.Y.S.2d 406), we conclude that the record reveals arguable nonfrivolous issues as to the voluntariness of the plea and the appropria......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT