People v. Eubanks, No. S049490
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (California) |
| Citation | 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778,907 P.2d 1324 |
| Decision Date | 14 December 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. S049490 |
| Parties | PEOPLE, Appellant, v. Gordon EUBANKS et al., Respondents. |
Page 778
v.
Gordon EUBANKS et al., Respondents.
Prior report: Cal.App., 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 846.
Respondents' petition for review GRANTED.
Application to file portion of petition for review under seal is granted pending further order of this court.
MOSK, KENNARD, GEORGE and WERDEGAR, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
45 practice notes
-
San Remo Hotel v. SAN FRACISCO CITY & CTY, No. S091757.
...(101 C.J.S. Zoning § 199).'" (Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 569, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 907 P.2d 1324; see S.F. Planning Code, § 178, subd. (d) [permitted conditional uses deemed abandoned if discontinued for three years]; S.F. Admin. Code, § ......
-
Conejo Wellness Ctr., Inc. v. City of Agoura Hills, B237718
...Constitutions. (See, e.g., Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 551–552, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 907 P.2d 1324 ( Hansen ).) In Hansen, the Supreme Court discussed the tension between local zoning ordinances and constitutional taking clauses: “A zoning......
-
Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. Superior Court, No. S052824
...S.Ct. 2886, 120 L.Ed.2d 798; Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 551, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 907 P.2d 1324.) As this court recognized in Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal Com. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 1006, 1016-1017, 73 Cal.Rptr.2d 841, 953 P.2d 1188, ......
-
Lynch v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, D064120
...use is unconstitutional. (Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 552, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 907 P.2d 1324 [“ ‘The rights of users of property as those rights existed at the time of the adoption of a zoning ordinance are well recognized and have always......
Request a trial to view additional results
45 cases
-
San Remo Hotel v. SAN FRACISCO CITY & CTY, No. S091757.
...(101 C.J.S. Zoning § 199).'" (Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 569, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 907 P.2d 1324; see S.F. Planning Code, § 178, subd. (d) [permitted conditional uses deemed abandoned if discontinued for three years]; S.F. Admin. Code, § ......
-
Conejo Wellness Ctr., Inc. v. City of Agoura Hills, B237718
...Constitutions. (See, e.g., Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 551–552, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 907 P.2d 1324 ( Hansen ).) In Hansen, the Supreme Court discussed the tension between local zoning ordinances and constitutional taking clauses: “A zoning......
-
Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. Superior Court, No. S052824
...S.Ct. 2886, 120 L.Ed.2d 798; Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 551, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 907 P.2d 1324.) As this court recognized in Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal Com. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 1006, 1016-1017, 73 Cal.Rptr.2d 841, 953 P.2d 1188, ......
-
Lynch v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, D064120
...use is unconstitutional. (Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 552, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 907 P.2d 1324 [“ ‘The rights of users of property as those rights existed at the time of the adoption of a zoning ordinance are well recognized and have always......
Request a trial to view additional results