People v. Fama
| Decision Date | 28 July 1997 |
| Citation | 241 A.D.2d 555,663 N.Y.S.2d 992 |
| Parties | , 1997 N.Y. Slip Op. 7012 The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Joseph FAMA, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Schapiro & Reich, Lindenhurst (Perry S. Reich, of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Monique Ferrell, of counsel), for respondent.
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated February 6, 1997 (People v. Fama, 212 A.D.2d 542, 622 N.Y.S.2d 732), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 11, 1990.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional Services, 96 CV 4860(SJ).
...the ground that petitioner "failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel." People v. Fama, 241 A.D.2d 555, 663 N.Y.S.2d 992 (1997). Shortly thereafter, petitioner requested by letter dated October 9, 1997, that this Court again hold his petition in ab......
-
Fama v. Comm'r of Correctional Serv.
...any defenses based on possible non-exhaustion of claims. The Appellate Division denied the writ on July 28, 1997. People v. Fama, 663 N.Y.S.2d 992 (2d Dep't 1997). In addition, acting pro se, Fama wrote to the district court requesting that his habeas proceeding remain on the suspense calen......