People v. Flores
| Decision Date | 23 April 2001 |
| Citation | 282 A.D.2d 688,725 N.Y.S.2d 655 |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>RAUL FLORES, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Santucci, J. P., Krausman, S. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.
At trial, one of the witnesses produced by the People was a woman who had previously lived with the defendant. During her cross-examination, the defense introduced into evidence a five-page letter written to the defendant in Spanish. The witness admitted that she was the author of the letter and read one sentence from it which was then translated in open court into English. Thereafter the entire letter, without an accompanying English translation, was received into evidence. The jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty, among other things, of kidnapping in the second degree.
The defendant moved to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (2) because he was apprised that one of the jurors who had a knowledge of Spanish had translated the entire letter for the jury. A hearing pursuant to CPL 330.30 was held, at which two members of the jury testified that during the course of deliberations, the jury summoned a court officer and inquired of him if they could have the entire letter translated into English. The court officer responded with words to the effect that the evidence was "the way it was," and asked the jury if they wanted to have someone from the court translate the letter for them. They responded that there was someone on the jury who spoke Spanish and that juror would translate for the entire jury. It appears that the court officer never properly informed the court of this exchange or instructed the jury to put their request to have the letter translated in written form and submit it to the court.
It is well settled that a court "may not delegate to a nonjudicial staff member its authority to instruct the jury on matters affecting their deliberations" (People v Bonaparte, 78 NY2d 26, 30; see also, People v Torres, 72 NY2d 1007; CPL 310.10 [1]). Here the court officer usurped the court's function by permitting the jury to believe that it could allow one of their members to translate the letter. Moreover, the juror's translation injected "non-record evidence into the calculus of judgment which a defendant cannot test or refute by cross-examination" (People v Maragh, 94 NY2d 569, 575).
Accordingly, under all these circumstances, the defendant is entitled to a new...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Mays
...v. Khalek, 91 N.Y.2d 838, 666 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 689 N.E.2d 914; People v. Cassell, 62 A.D.3d 1021, 880 N.Y.S.2d 303; People v. Flores, 282 A.D.2d 688, 689, 725 N.Y.S.2d 655). In Ahmed (66 N.Y.2d at 309–310, 496 N.Y.S.2d 984, 487 N.E.2d 894), the defendant agreed to allow the court's law secret......
-
People v. Davis
...independent translation of a letter in evidence written in a language other than [924 N.Y.S.2d 136] English ( see e.g. People v. Flores, 282 A.D.2d 688, 689, 725 N.Y.S.2d 655), a juror's relay of particular information from outside the jury about the defendant's guilt or innocence ( see e.g......
-
People v. Moise
...officer's supervisor to deliberating jury was improper usurpation of judicial function and warranted reversal]; People v. Flores, 282 A.D.2d 688, 725 N.Y.S.2d 655 [2d Dept. 2001] [court officer usurped judge's role by responding to juror question and not informing the court of the issue] ).......
- People v. Chronis
-
Submission to jury
...opinion” to the effect that the injured plaintiff could have been hallucinating. § 20:30 NEW YORK OBJECTIONS — 20-10 People v. Flores , 282 A.D.2d 688, 725 N.Y.S.2d 655 (2d Dept. 2001). It was error to have a letter that had been introduced into evidence in Spanish be translated by one of t......
-
Submission to jury
...could offer a “professional opinion” to the effect that the injured plaintiff could have been hallucinating. People v. Flores , 282 A.D.2d 688, 725 N.Y.S.2d 655 (2d Dept. 2001). It was error to have a letter that had been introduced into evidence in Spanish be translated by one of the juror......
-
Table of cases
...737, 536 N.Y.S.2d 727 (1988), § 10:10 People v. Fleming , 90 N.Y.2d 947, 524 N.Y.S.2d 670 (1988), §§ 1:170, 1:190 People v. Flores, 282 A.D.2d 688, 725 N.Y.S.2d 655 (2d Dept. 2001), § 20:30 People v. Flower s, 83 A.D.3d 524, 922 N.Y.S.2d 297 (1st Dept. 2011), § 5:130 People v. Floyd , 21 N.......
-
Submission to jury
...psychologist could ofer a “professional opinion” to the efect that the injured plaintif could have been hallucinating. People v. Flores , 282 A.D.2d 688, 725 N.Y.S.2d 655 (2d Dept. 2001). It was error to have a letter that had been introduced into evidence in Spanish be translated by one of......