People v. Flores

Decision Date14 February 1969
Docket NumberCr. 15501
Citation269 Cal.App.2d 666,75 Cal.Rptr. 231
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesThe PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ruben Lopez FLORES, Defendant and Appellant.

Donald F. Roeschke, Tarzana, under appointment by Court of Appeal, for defendant and appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Rose-Marie Gruenwald, Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff and respondent.

FOURT, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal by Ruben Lopez Flores from a judgment of conviction of forgery.

In an information filed in Los Angeles on March 13, 1968, appellant with codefendant Dolores Flores was charged in count I with conspiring to commit forgery on January 13, 1968, in count II with forgery on January 13, 1968, in count III with forgery on January 15, 1968, in count IV with forgery on January 16, 1968, in count V with forgery on January 18, 1968, and in counts VI and VII with forgery on the 22nd and 23rd of January 1968 respectively. Each defendant represented by separate counsel pleaded not guilty. It was stipulated that the cause be submitted on the testimony contained in the transcript of the proceedings had at the preliminary hearing, each side reserving the right to offer additional evidence. Ruben Flores testified and he was found guilty as charged in counts III and V. All other counts were dismissed. He was sentenced to the state prison, the terms to run concurrently. A notice of appeal was timely filed by Ruben Flores.

A re sume of some of the facts is as follows: Mrs. Carmen Velasquez possessed a Master Charge credit card which expired on December 7, 1967. A renewal card was directed to her address and although she never received the new card (the 1968 card), charges were made against her account in the amount of $7,800.00 during the latter part of December 1967 and January 1968. Included within such amount was an item of $34.02 on January 15, 1968, for tropical fish and supplies and an item of $45.00 on January 18, 1968, for dental services. Mrs. Velasquez had given no one permission to use her card or sign her name on the sales drafts representing the transactions of January 15th and 18th. Mrs. Velasquez did not make the purchases in question on the dates indicated. (Count III) Arnold Davis operated Arnold's Aquaria, a tropical fish store in Whittier. On January 13, 1968, defendants purchased some aquarium supplies from Davis and used the Velasquez Master Charge credit card in the transaction. Dolores Flores signed the sales draft with the name Carmen Velasquez. On January 15, 1968, defendants were again present at the store and Ruben selected various tropical fish which were placed in bags and Dolores again signed the name Carmen Velasquez on a Master Charge credit card sales draft in the amount of $34.02. Appellant stood about two feet behind Dolores at the time she made the false signature and he thereupon carried out the bags containing the fish and other items which they had purchased. Appellant had driven Dolores to the store, he helped in the selection of the fish which were purchased, and he drove Dolores back to her home with the items so secured. On January 16, 1968, defendants returned again to the store and purchased some additional supplies and appellant at that time told Davis that the aquarium supplies, etc., were for himself although again Dolores purportedly paid for the items by signing the name Carmen Velasquez to a Master Charge sales draft. (Count V) Yvonne Oddo was a receptionist to Dr. Klein, a dentist who had an office in Whittier. On five different occasions, Dr. Klein performed dental services for appellant who made his appointments under the name of Ruben Velasquez. On January 18, 1968, Dolores was in the dentist's office and said to Miss Oddo, 'I came to pay Mr. Velasquez' bill, to pay on his bill.' Dolores thereupon signed the name Carmen Velasquez to a Master Charge credit sales draft in the amount of $45.00. Dolores returned to the office of the dentist on January 22nd and 23rd and paid $49.00 and $25.00 respectively on appellant's account by signing the name of Carmen Velasquez to a Master Charge sales draft. Appellant was not present in the office of the dentist when Dolores signed the sales drafts but he was somewhere in the building. Dolores was married to appellant's brother.

Appellant now asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment.

It is appropriately stated in People v. Belenger, 222 Cal.App.2d 159, 163, 34 Cal.Rptr. 918, 920, as follows:

'To 'aid'...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Phillips' Estate, In re
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 14, 1969
  • Donchin v. Guerrero, B081043
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 1995
    ...or warding off suspicion. Such conduct is receivable in evidence as indicating a consciousness of guilt...."]; (People v. Flores (1969) 269 Cal.App.2d 666, 670, 75 Cal.Rptr. 231 ["The making of a false statement for the purpose of warding off suspicion is also receivable evidence to demonst......
  • People v. Gonzales
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 18, 1970
    ... ... '' (Emphasis added.) (See People v. Flores, 269 Cal.App.2d 666, 669--670, 75 Cal.Rptr. 231, 233.) ...         The opinion in People v. Moore, supra, concludes with this statement of law, which is applicable in this case ... "Where two or more persons enter upon a common undertaking, whether by prearrangement, or entered into on ... ...
  • People v. Neder
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 20, 1971
    ... ...         On April 4, 1969, codefendant, Mariquita Dene Fish, accompanied by [16 Cal.App.3d 850] defendant, used Gruskin's credit card with Gruskin's name printed on the front and signed on the back to make purchases from three clerks at a Sears store. Codefendant gave Margaret Flores, a clerk, the card to purchase a dress. Mrs. Flores wrote up an invoice sales slip and imprinted the card on it. Codefendant signed the slip. Defendant was with her throughout ...         Neal Smith, another clerk, saw defendant and codefendant selecting merchandise. They purchased ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT